Cerita yang dikisahkan ulang: Refleksi terhadap pembelajaran narasi pada studio desain tahun pertama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.748
Kata Kunci:
narasi, studio arsitektur, representasi, estrangementAbstrak
Tulisan ini melihat implementasi dan bagaiman pembelajaran narasi pada studio desain arsitektural tahun pertama dapat meningkatkan kemampuan mencipta, berkomunikasi, dan refleksi. Secara khusus, tulisan ini menginvestigasi teknik estrangement yang memungkinkan adanya pandangan yang lebih objektif terhadap sebuah cerita dan penceritaannya. Teknik ini memberikan peluang mahasiswa untuk melepas narasi yang sudah ada dari konteksnya, untuk kemudian dianalisis dan dimasukkan ke dalam konteks yang baru. Kami fokus pada tugas akhir mahasiswa semester satu program studi Arsitektur dan Arsitektur Interior di Universitas Indonesia sebagai konteks studi ini. Tulisan ini kemudian menganalisis proses pengerjaan, hasil akhir, dan umpan balik mahasiswa untuk mendapatkan pengetahuan akan pembelajaran apa yang dicapai oleh mahasiswa. Studi ini menemukan bahwa kerangka kerja narasi dapat membantu mahasiswa untuk berpikir secara sistematis. Akhirnya, teknik estrangement memberikan mahasiswa kesempatan untuk menghasilkan pandangan baru dalam mengisahkan cerita dengan mempertahankan beberapa aspek narasi dan mengubah aspek lainnya. Pandangan baru ini tercapai melalui meningkatkan tingkat ambigu sebuah narasi dan interaksi antara pemilik desain dan hadirinnya.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abbott, H. Porter. 2002. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Alon-Mozes, Tal. 2006. ‘From “Reading” the Landscape to “Writing” a Garden: The Narrative Approach in the Design Studio’. Journal of Landscape Architecture 1 (1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2006.9723362.
Austin, Tricia. 2020. Narrative Environments and Experience Design: Space as a Medium of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bolton, Gillie. 2006. ‘Narrative Writing: Reflective Enquiry into Professional Practice’. Educational Action Research 14 (2): 203–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600718076.
Brandt, Carol B., Katherine Cennamo, Sarah Douglas, Mitzi Vernon, Margarita McGrath, and Yolanda Reimer. 2013. ‘A Theoretical Framework for the Studio as a Learning Environment’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 (2): 329–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5.
Brown, Robert, and Patrick Clark. 2013. ‘From Bourdieu to Friere (by Way of Boal): Facilitating Creative Thinking through Play’. Field Journal 5 (1): 33–51.
Bruner, Jerome. 1987. ‘Life as Narrative’. Social Research 54 (1): 23.
Cennamo, Katherine, and Carol Brandt. 2012. ‘The “Right Kind of Telling”: Knowledge Building in the Academic Design Studio’. Educational Technology Research and Development 60 (5): 839–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5.
Clear, Nic. 2014. ‘Convergence: Architecture as Integrated Spatial Design’. In Educating Architects: How Tomorrow’s Practitioners Will Learn Today, edited by Neil Spiller and Nic Clear. London New York: Thames & Hudson.
Douglas, Evan. 2014. ‘Blendscapes: In Support of a New Era of Transdisciplinary Exchange in Architecture’. In Educating Architects: How Tomorrow’s Practitioners Will Learn Today, edited by Neil Spiller and Nic Clear. London New York: Thames & Hudson.
Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia. 2018. Academic Guidebook 2016-2020. 2018th ed. http://eng.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/Buku-Kurikulum-2018-2.pdf.
Gerards, Sebastiaan, and Sylvain De Bleeckere. 2014. ‘Narrative Thinking in Architectural Education’. In Beyond Architecture: New Intersections & Connections, 305–11. Honolulu, United States: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Graff, Daniel, and Mark A. Clark. 2019. ‘Communication Modes in Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment of Metaphors, Visualization, and Narratives in Multidisciplinary Design Student Teams’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 29 (1): 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9437-9.
Harahap, M. Mirza Y., Kate Tregloan, and Anna Nervegna. 2019. ‘Rationality and Creativity Interplay in Research by Design as Seen from the Inside’. Interiority 2 (2): 177–94. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.65.
Hisarligil, Beyhan Bolak. 2012. ‘Franz Kafka in the Design Studio: A Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Approach to Architectural Design Education’. International Journal of Art & Design Education 31 (3): 256–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01764.x.
Leshem, Shosh, and Vernon N. Trafford. 2006. ‘Stories as Mirrors: Reflective Practice in Teaching and Learning’. Reflective Practice 7 (1): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500489567.
Lucas, Ray. 2016. Research Methods for Architecture. London: Laurence King Publishing.
Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
McAlpine, Lynn. 2016. ‘Why Might You Use Narrative Methodology? A Story about Narrative’. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education 4 (1): 32–57. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b.
Nazidizaji, Sajjad, Ana Tome, Francisco Regateiro, and Ahmadreza Keshtkar Ghalati. 2015. ‘Narrative Ways of Architecture Education: A Case Study’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 (July): 1640–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.213.
Saginatari, Diandra Pandu, and Paramita Atmodiwirjo. 2017. ‘Contextual Visual Representation of Surrounding Environment’. Conference session presented at The International Visual Methods Conference 5: Visualising the City, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Saginatari, Diandra Pandu, and Paramita Atmodiwirjo. 2018. ‘Reflection on Ecological Learning Through Architectural Design Studio’. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment) 45 (1): 73. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.1.73-84.
Schön, Donald A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. 1. ed. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
Spiegel, Simon. 2008. ‘Things Made Strange: On the Concept of “Estrangement” in Science Fiction Theory’. SCIENCE FICTION STUDIES 35: 17.
Thompson, James. 2019. Narratives of Architectural Education: From Student to Architect. Routledge Research in Architecture. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Till, Jeremy. 2009. Architecture Depends. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Troiani, Igea. 2012. ‘Sci-Fi Eco-Architecture: Science Fiction, Sustainability and Design Studio’. Architectural Research Quarterly 16 (4): 313–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135513000201.
Wahid, Arif Rahman, and Paramita Atmodiwirjo. 2018. ‘Storyboard as a Representation of Urban Architectural Settings’. Edited by R.B. Santosa, N.C. Idham, N.G. Yuli, and P.Ap. Agustiananda. SHS Web of Conferences 41: 07004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184107004.
Wall, Alan. 2013. Myth, Metaphor and Science. Chester: University of Chester Press. http://qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3413001.
Wang, Tsungjuang. 2010. ‘A New Paradigm for Design Studio Education’. International Journal of Art & Design Education 29 (2): 173–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01647.x.
Yocom, Ken, Gundula Proksch, Branden Born, and Shannon K. Tyman. 2012. ‘The Built Environments Laboratory: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Studio Education in the Planning and Design Disciplines’. Journal for Education in the Built Environment 7 (2): 8–25. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2012.07020008.
