Investigating locality: Socio-cultural and technological perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.1009

Keywords:

Locality, Socio-cultural, Technological, ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur

Abstract

This edition of ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur presents a series of the investigation into the locality as an attempt to contribute to the development of architectural knowledge that addresses particular contexts. In architecture, as in many other disciplines, knowledge is developed and transformed through inquiry and investigation, as a means to take a position in relation to the existing knowledge. Knowledge is established through the process of dialectic that contains three parts: the thesis as the originating idea, position, or statement; the antithesis as the opposite or counter-argument to the thesis; and the synthesis as the reconciliation or transformation of those two (Fichte, 1868). Through the continuing process of dialectic, knowledge is not static and limited to what has been known before but is continuously transformed through questioning, arguing, and re-positioning. Research as a form of inquiry and investigation plays an important role in establishing the debate within the discipline (Smith, 2012) to push the boundaries of knowledge.  Architecture as a form of knowledge should be developed through research (Till, 2011), which could be performed through a range of research methods (Groat & Wang, 2013; Lucas, 2016)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Yandi Andri Yatmo, University of Indonesia

    Guru Besar Prodi. Arsitektur Universitas Indonesia

    Scopus ID: 24774175300

  • Paramita Atmodiwirjo, University of Indonesia

    orcid.jpg Orchid ID: 0000-0002-7182-5531

    scopus.jpg Scopus ID: 36184976900

References

Atmodiwirjo, Paramita, and Yandi Andri Yatmo. 2020. ‘“Tanahku Indonesia” : On Materialscape as the Materiality of a Nation’. Architecture and Culture 8 (2): 328–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1774850.

Certeau, Michel de. 1980. Practice of Everyday Life. California: University of California Press.

Corbusier, Le. 1985. Towards a New Architecture. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.

Durand, Louis. 2000. Précis of the Lectures on Architecture. Edited by David Britt and Antoine Picon. Los Angeles, California, United States: Getty Research Institute.

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1868. The Science of Knowledge. Philadelphia: Lippincott & Co.

Frampton, Kenneth. 1983. ‘Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance’. In The Anti-Aesthetic Essays on Postmodern Culture, edited by Hal Foster, 16–30. Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press. https://monoskop.org/images/0/07/Foster_Hal_ed_The_Anti-Aesthetic_Essays_on_Postmodern_Culture.pdf.

Groat, Linda N., and David Wang. 2013. Architectural Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ingold, Tim. 2007. ‘Materials against Materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127.

Lucas, Raymond. 2016. Research Methods for Architecture. London, England: Laurence King Publishing.

Smith, Korydon, and Miguel Guitart, eds. 2012. Introducing Architectural Theory: Debating a Discipline. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Routledge.

Till, Jeremy. 2011. ‘Is Doing Architecture Doing Research?’ In 4IAU 4a Jornadas Internacionales Sobre Investigación En Arquitectura y Urbanismo. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València.

Vitruvius. 1960. The Ten Books on Architecture. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.

Wigglesworth, Sarah, and Jeremy Till, eds. 1998. The Everyday and Architecture (Architectural Design). Academy Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-01

How to Cite

“Investigating Locality: Socio-Cultural and Technological Perspectives”. 2021. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.1009.

Most read articles by the same author(s)