Cultural significance of the Jatiroto sugar factory official house in Stasiun Street Lumajang Regency

Antariksa; Herry Santosa; Wahyuni Eka Sari

doi:10.30822/arteks.v6i2.725

Authors

Antariksa University of Brawijaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-4750 (unauthenticated)
Herry Santosa University of Brawijaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-5569 (unauthenticated)
Wahyuni Eka Sari University of Brawijaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-2680 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.725

Keywords:

Cultural significance, Jatiroto sugar factory official house, Lumajang Regency

Abstract

The assessment of cultural significance is important to the processes involved in the determination of building preservation policies. The cultural significance is mostly invisible or intangible in a cultural heritage building and contained in the form of value or meaning which are sometimes misinterpreted and this means it is possible to judge a building as worthy or unworthy to be preserved for the interests of the past, present, and future through the evaluation its importance. Moreover, some important elements are usually contained in a cultural heritage building which can be excavated through their cultural significance. This research was, therefore, conducted to determine the cultural significance of residential buildings in the Jatiroto Sugar Factory area complex at Lumajang Regency, East Java to be used in formulating policies required to preserve the structures as a cultural heritage for the benefit of future generations. This involved the use of the descriptive method to describe the situation in the field while the weighted evaluative method was applied to evaluate the cultural significance value of the building and its elements. The results were used as the criteria to determine the cultural significance of the official house of the Jatiroto Sugar Factory which can be applied as the reference to formulate the cultural significance criteria for similar cultural heritage buildings in other locations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australia Icomos International Council on Monuments and Sites. 1981. ‘Guidelines to The Burra Charter Cultural Significance and Conservation Policy’. Australia Icomos. 1981. https://australia.icomos.org/publications/burra-charter-practice-notes/burra-charter-archival-documents/.

Bakri, Aidatul Fadzlin, Norhati Ibrahim, Sabarinah Sh Ahmad, and Nurulhusna Qamaruz Zaman. 2015. ‘Public Perception on the Cultural Significance of Heritage Buildings in Kuala Lumpur’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 202 (August): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.233.

Catanese, Anthony J., Jeffrey E. Ollswang, and James C. Snyder. 1979. Introduction to Urban Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Estin, Novia, Antariksa, and Noviani Suryasari. 2017. ‘Pelestarian Bangunan Kolonial Belanda Di Jalan Pemuda Depok’. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Brawijaya 9 (2): 52–59. http://arsitektur.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/334.

Feilden, Bernard. 2007. Conservation of Historic Buildings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080502915.

Hastijanti, Retno. 2016. ‘Analisis Penilaian Bangunan Cagar Budaya’. Research Gate. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308203329_Analisis_Penilaian_Bangunan_Cagar_Budaya.

Kerr, James Semple. 1990. The Conservation Plan: A Guide to the Preparation of Conservation Plans for European Cultural Significant. Sydney: National Trust New South Wales.

Kurniawan, Nanang. 2013. ‘Partisipasi Stakeholder Dalam Pelestarian Kawasan Rindam IV/ Diponegoro Kota Magelang Sebagai Kawasan Bersejarah’. JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN WILAYAH & KOTA 9 (1): 31. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v9i1.6504.

Martokusumo, Widjaja. 2017. ‘Pemaknaan Tempat Dalam Pelestarian Arsitektur’. In Seminar Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 001–010. Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.1.001.

Paramitha, Ida Ayu Diah, I Wayan Kastawan, and Widiastuti. 2017. ‘Nilai Signifikansi Cagar Budaya Hotel Inna Bali, Jalan Veteran Denpasar’. Ruang : Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (Space : Journal of the Built Environment) 4 (2): 113–28. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ruang/article/view/39667/24055.

Prabawa, Made Agus Adi, I Made Adhika, and Ida Bagus Gde Wirawibawa. 2019. ‘Konservasi Arsitektur Pura Berbasis Komunitas Di Pura Dasar Buana Gelgel, Klungkung’. Ruang : Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (Space : Journal of the Built Environment) 6 (1): 5–20. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ruang/article/view/50073/29816.

Prameswari, Tri Ajeng, Antariksa, and Noviani Suryasari. 2017. ‘Pelestarian Bangunan Kolonial Belanda Kantor Gubernur Jawa Timur (Gouverneur Kantoor Van Oost Java)’. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Brawijaya 5 (1): 1–9. http://arsitektur.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/333.

Purwaningsih, Lucia Helly. 2015. ‘Kajian Signifikansi Budaya (Cultural Significance) Pada Permukiman Pecinan Tangerang’. In “Finding The Fifth Element… After Water, Earth, Wind, and Fire” Local Wisdom and Cultural Sustainability. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144967168.pdf.

Putra, Bayu Nugroho, Antariksa, and Ridjal Abraham Mohammad. 2017. ‘Pelestarian Bangunan Kolonial Museum Fatahillah Di Kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta’. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Brawijaya 5 (1). http://arsitektur.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/338.

Rahmadhiani, Yunanistya. 2016. ‘Analisis Karakter Visual Arsitektural Dan Penilaian Makna Kultural Sebagai Pendekatan Pelestarian Bangunan Kolonial Inna Bali Hotel Di Denpasar’. Ruang : Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (Space : Journal of the Built Environment) 3 (1): 53–66. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ruang/article/view/20762/13569.

Ramli, Syamsun, Antariksa, and Herry Santosa. 2020. ‘Assessment of Aesthetical Quality of Architectural Elements of Colonial Buildings in Jalan Basuki Rahmat, Malang’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.250.

Ramli, Syamsun, Herry Santosa, and Antariksa. 2020. ‘Signifikansi Elemen Arsitektur Bangunan Kolonial Bergaya Art Deco Di Kota Malang’. Pawon: Jurnal Arsitektur 4 (02): 63–78. https://doi.org/10.36040/pawon.v4i02.2806.

Suryono, Alwin, Antariksa Sudikno, and Purnama Salura. 2013. ‘Conservation of Dutch Colonial Architecture Heritage On Rectorate Building of Education University of Indonesia in Bandung’. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 3 (8).

Sutanto, Ari. 2014. ‘Faktor-Faktor Keterbengkalaian Benteng Toboali Sebagai Bangunan Bersejarah’. JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN WILAYAH & KOTA 10 (1): 94. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v10i1.7636.

Sutomo, Irham Temas, and Aidil Surya. 2018. ‘Cultural Significance: Kawasan Bersejarah Kota Siak Sri Indrapura’. In Seminar Kota Layak Huni/Livable Space: Urbanisasi Dan Pengembangan Perkotaan. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/lslivas/article/view/2763.

Timang, Vica Vanessa Sesaryo, Antariksa Antariksa, and Ismu Rini Dwi Ari. 2016. ‘Pelestarian Dukun Buntula’bi Balusu Sebagai Warisan Budaya Di Kabupaten Toraja Utara’. Jurnal Penataan Ruang 11 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2716179X.v11i1.5214.

Truscott, Marilyn Claire. 2014. ‘Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (1999)’. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, 1078–82. New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1046.

Vembrista, Gevi. 2017. ‘Karakter Spasial Dan Karakter Visual Rumah Dinas Kolonial Belanda Pabrik Gula Jatiroto’. Universitas Brawijaya.

Wahyuni, Sri. 2019. ‘Placemaking Sebagai Strategi Revitalisasi Kawasan. Studi Kasus : Kawasan Pecinan Kota Makassar’. Jurnal Linears 1 (2): 103–11. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-linears.v1i2.1815.