The conception of actor network in Jelekong Art and Culture Village of Bandung Regency
Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 1, 2021
Keywords:
Action translation, Actors, Actor-network theory, Arts and culture, Heterogeneous networks, Jelekong Village
Main Article Content
Abstract
Jelekong is an art and culture village in Baleendah Sub-district of Bandung Regency which is well known for its activities in paintings and wayang golek or puppet crafts. The village’s character related to art is also shaped by several actions and relationships between socio-technical actors apart from the existence of artists and their activities. This research was, therefore, conducted to describe Jelekong Village as a heterogeneous socio-technical network by identifying and analyzing several actors and actions using Actor-Network Theory (ANT) which is a qualitative research method. Five network-actor conception prepositions including 1) the will of actan, 2) actors, 3) composition and translation of action, 4) network locality, and 5) network representation were reviewed to determine the phenomenon of the heterogeneous network formed in the village. The results showed several factors required in becoming Jelekong Village network and they include 1) the artist's will to initiate art actions, 2) existence of sociotechnical agent such as actors and resources related to the artist, 3) a very complex art relationship, 4) establishment of an art environment such as a studio and gallery, and 5) the meaning of art space for artists as a forum to preserve arts and culture as well as potential economic resources.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Prasetyo, Eko Bagus, and Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo. 2021. “The Conception of Actor Network in Jelekong Art and Culture Village of Bandung Regency”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.286.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Akrich, Madeleine, and Bruno Latour. 1992. ‘A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies’. In Shaping Technology/Building Society Studies in Sociotecnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 259–64. London: MIT Press Cambridge.
Callon, Michel. 1984. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
———. 1990. ‘Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility’. The Sociological Review 38 (1_suppl): 132–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x.
Couldry, Nick. 2008. ‘Actor Network Theory and Media: Do They Connect and On What Terms?’ In Connectivity, Networks and Flows: Conceptualizing Contemporary Communications, edited by A Hepp, F. Krotz, S. Moores, and C. Winter, 93–110. Cresskil, NJ, USA: Hampton Press, Inc. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16380981.pdf.
Darsiharjo, and Ahmad Hudaiby Galihkusumah. 2014. ‘Analisis Rantai Nilai Industri Kreatif Di Desa Wisata Jelekong Kabupaten Bandung’. Jurnal Manajemen Resort & Leisure 11 (1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.17509/jurel.v11i1.2900.
Ekomadyo, Agus S., and Andhika Riyadi. 2020. ‘Design in Socio-Technical Perspective: An Actor-Network Theory Reflection on Community Project “Kampung Kreatif” in Bandung’. Archives of Design Research 33 (2): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.05.33.2.19.
Ekomadyo, Agus, and Sonny Yuliar. 2015. ‘Social Reassembling as Design Strategies’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 184 (May): 152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075.
IndoMaritim. 2020. ‘Keragaman Budaya Daerah Adalah Kekayaan Budaya Nasional’. IndoMaritim.Id. 2020. https://indomaritim.id/keragaman-budaya-daerah-adalah-kekayaan-budaya-nasional/.
Kurniawan, I Made. 2007. ‘Kampung Seni: Tema Metafora Tari Dalam Arsitektur’. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya. https://docplayer.info/65233769-Judul-tugas-akhir-kampung-seni-tema-metafora-tari-dalam-arsitektur.html.
Latour, Bruno. 1992. ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and John Law, 151–80. London: MIT Press Cambridge. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/pluginfile.php/877054/mod_resource/content/3/dd308_1_missing_masses.pdf.
———. 1996. ‘On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications’. Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163?seq=1.
———. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Newy York: Oxford University Press. https://www.ufrgs.br/ppgas/portal/arquivos/orientacoes/LATOUR_Bruno._2012.pdf.
Law, John. 2000. ‘Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity’. In Organizational Studies : Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 2nd ed., 853–68. London: Routledge. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf.
Lezaun, Javier. 2017. ‘Actor-Network Theory’. In Social Theory Now, edited by C. Benzecry, M. Krause, and I. Reed, 1–36. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://www.academia.edu/34100806/Actor_Network_Theory_Social_Theory_Now_.
Prasetyo, Eko Bagus, Andrew Cokro Putra, Bima Rahmaputra, and Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo. 2020. ‘Architectural Adaptation Strategy of Shophouses in Jalan Tubagus Ismail, Bandung’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.72.
Priyatmoko, Heri, and Bambang Purwanto. 2013. ‘Sejarah Sosial Komunitas Seniman Di Kemlayan Surakarta 1930-an-1970-An’. Universitas Gadjah Mada. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/62871.
Purbadi, Yohanes Djarot, and Reginaldo Christophori Lake. 2019. ‘Konsep Kampung-Wisata Sejahtera, Kreatif, Cerdas Dan Lestari Berkelanjutan’. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture 5 (1): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v5i1.641.
Setiawan, Irvan. 2012. ‘Keberadaan Kampung Seni Jelekong Dalam Menunjang Kebutuhan Ekonomi Rumah Tangga’. Patanjala : Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya 4 (2): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v4i2.140.
Setiawan, Nisa Amalina, and Farid Hamid U. 2014. ‘Strategi Promosi Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Lokal Di Desa Wisata Jelekong’. TRIKONOMIKA 13 (2): 184–94. https://doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v13i2.613.
Sumantri, Diaz. 2019. ‘Strategi Pengembangan Desa Wisata Di Kelurahan Jelekong, Kabupaten Bandung’. Jurnal Geografi Lingkungan Tropik 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v2i2.47.
Wardhani, Saraswati T., Steafni N. Sabatini, Rachmaniatus D., and Tamiya M. S. Kasman. 2016. ‘Identifikasi Kampung Kreatif Sebagai Strategi Kota Tangguh’. In Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2016: INFRASTRUKTUR WILAYAH KOTA, edited by Gatot Adi Susilo, Putri Herlia Pramitasari, Ghoustanjiwani Adi Putra, Bayu Teguh Ujianto, and Hamka, 15–20. Malang: Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Institut Teknologi Nasional, Malang. https://temuilmiah.iplbi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IPLBI2016-B-015-020-Identifikasi-Kampung-Kreatif-sebagai-Strategi-Kota-Tangguh.pdf.
Yuliar, Sonny. 2015. Tata Kelola Teknologi : Perspektif Teori Jaringan-Aktor. 2nd ed. Bandung: ITB Press.
Callon, Michel. 1984. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
———. 1990. ‘Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility’. The Sociological Review 38 (1_suppl): 132–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x.
Couldry, Nick. 2008. ‘Actor Network Theory and Media: Do They Connect and On What Terms?’ In Connectivity, Networks and Flows: Conceptualizing Contemporary Communications, edited by A Hepp, F. Krotz, S. Moores, and C. Winter, 93–110. Cresskil, NJ, USA: Hampton Press, Inc. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16380981.pdf.
Darsiharjo, and Ahmad Hudaiby Galihkusumah. 2014. ‘Analisis Rantai Nilai Industri Kreatif Di Desa Wisata Jelekong Kabupaten Bandung’. Jurnal Manajemen Resort & Leisure 11 (1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.17509/jurel.v11i1.2900.
Ekomadyo, Agus S., and Andhika Riyadi. 2020. ‘Design in Socio-Technical Perspective: An Actor-Network Theory Reflection on Community Project “Kampung Kreatif” in Bandung’. Archives of Design Research 33 (2): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.05.33.2.19.
Ekomadyo, Agus, and Sonny Yuliar. 2015. ‘Social Reassembling as Design Strategies’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 184 (May): 152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075.
IndoMaritim. 2020. ‘Keragaman Budaya Daerah Adalah Kekayaan Budaya Nasional’. IndoMaritim.Id. 2020. https://indomaritim.id/keragaman-budaya-daerah-adalah-kekayaan-budaya-nasional/.
Kurniawan, I Made. 2007. ‘Kampung Seni: Tema Metafora Tari Dalam Arsitektur’. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya. https://docplayer.info/65233769-Judul-tugas-akhir-kampung-seni-tema-metafora-tari-dalam-arsitektur.html.
Latour, Bruno. 1992. ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and John Law, 151–80. London: MIT Press Cambridge. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/pluginfile.php/877054/mod_resource/content/3/dd308_1_missing_masses.pdf.
———. 1996. ‘On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications’. Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163?seq=1.
———. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Newy York: Oxford University Press. https://www.ufrgs.br/ppgas/portal/arquivos/orientacoes/LATOUR_Bruno._2012.pdf.
Law, John. 2000. ‘Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity’. In Organizational Studies : Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 2nd ed., 853–68. London: Routledge. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf.
Lezaun, Javier. 2017. ‘Actor-Network Theory’. In Social Theory Now, edited by C. Benzecry, M. Krause, and I. Reed, 1–36. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://www.academia.edu/34100806/Actor_Network_Theory_Social_Theory_Now_.
Prasetyo, Eko Bagus, Andrew Cokro Putra, Bima Rahmaputra, and Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo. 2020. ‘Architectural Adaptation Strategy of Shophouses in Jalan Tubagus Ismail, Bandung’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.72.
Priyatmoko, Heri, and Bambang Purwanto. 2013. ‘Sejarah Sosial Komunitas Seniman Di Kemlayan Surakarta 1930-an-1970-An’. Universitas Gadjah Mada. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/62871.
Purbadi, Yohanes Djarot, and Reginaldo Christophori Lake. 2019. ‘Konsep Kampung-Wisata Sejahtera, Kreatif, Cerdas Dan Lestari Berkelanjutan’. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture 5 (1): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v5i1.641.
Setiawan, Irvan. 2012. ‘Keberadaan Kampung Seni Jelekong Dalam Menunjang Kebutuhan Ekonomi Rumah Tangga’. Patanjala : Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya 4 (2): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v4i2.140.
Setiawan, Nisa Amalina, and Farid Hamid U. 2014. ‘Strategi Promosi Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Lokal Di Desa Wisata Jelekong’. TRIKONOMIKA 13 (2): 184–94. https://doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v13i2.613.
Sumantri, Diaz. 2019. ‘Strategi Pengembangan Desa Wisata Di Kelurahan Jelekong, Kabupaten Bandung’. Jurnal Geografi Lingkungan Tropik 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v2i2.47.
Wardhani, Saraswati T., Steafni N. Sabatini, Rachmaniatus D., and Tamiya M. S. Kasman. 2016. ‘Identifikasi Kampung Kreatif Sebagai Strategi Kota Tangguh’. In Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2016: INFRASTRUKTUR WILAYAH KOTA, edited by Gatot Adi Susilo, Putri Herlia Pramitasari, Ghoustanjiwani Adi Putra, Bayu Teguh Ujianto, and Hamka, 15–20. Malang: Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Institut Teknologi Nasional, Malang. https://temuilmiah.iplbi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IPLBI2016-B-015-020-Identifikasi-Kampung-Kreatif-sebagai-Strategi-Kota-Tangguh.pdf.
Yuliar, Sonny. 2015. Tata Kelola Teknologi : Perspektif Teori Jaringan-Aktor. 2nd ed. Bandung: ITB Press.