Menggugat Logika Pembangunan: Kritik Karl Polanyi atas Kelangkaan sebagai Desain Kekuasaan

Authors

  • Wilhelmus F. N. Runesi Alumnus Fakultas Filsafat Unwira Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/mwg2ks04

Abstract

The order of the universal of human life is no longer natural, because during this time, humans live in a world full of the hustle and bustle of economic and political transaction that have exceeded the limits of space and time. Karl Polanyi in his intelectual struggle, showed a paradox: What we enjoy in this world is something was not natural. The extraordinary changes that have occured  this century are a design. Economics, politics, the concept of human rights, and political freedom or democratic government are part of the rhetoric of this limitation. However, in addition to the design of the current rhetorical arguments, society lives in a world of extraordinary deprivation, poverty, and oppression. Various problem, both new and old, are mixed together and can no longer be separated. Poverty, unmet basic needs, widespread hunger, violations of political freedom, and legal transaction have finally become banal. Polanyi gives us a basis for thinking about history and internal logic of economics because only this way, we can understand that social problem such as restrictiveness access to the saturated, scarcity, and the failure to fully satisfy society's needs are rhetorical design so that problems are  sounds like a natural event.

References

Badan KPA. Dekade Krisis Agraria: Warisan Nawacita dan Masa Depan Reforma Agraria Pasca Perubahan Politik 2024, (Desember 2023)

Badan KPA. Adakah Reforma Agraria di Bawah Komando Prabowo?: Catatan Akhir Tahun 2024, (Desember 2024)

Callahan, Gene. Economic for Real People: An Introduction to the Austrian School, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004

Cavanugh, Wiliam T. Being Consumed: Economics and Christian Desire, USA: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2008

Chester Jordan, William. The Great Famine: Northern Europa in the Early Fourteenth Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996

Gahral Adian, Donny. “Karl Polanyi dan Antropologi Keadilan”, dalam Respons (Jurnal Etika Sosial), vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, p. 39-59

Guriev, Sergei and Treisman, Daniel. Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century, Princeton University Press, 2022

Haryatmoko. Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2010

Harvey, David. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010

Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)

Herry-Priyono, B. Memburu Manusia Ekonomi, Menggeledah Naluri, Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2022

_________. Ekonomi Politik: Dalam Pusara Globalisasi & Neoliberalisme, Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2022

Hӧfee, Otfried. Critique of Freedom: The Central Problem of Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago, 2020

Jebadu, Alexander. Dalam Moncong Neoliberalisme, Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2021

Konings, Martijn. The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressivnes Have Missed, Stanford University Press, 2015

Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis, London: Penguin, 1979

Mannheim, Karl. Ideologi dan Utopia: Menyingkap Kaitan Pikiran dan Politik, (trans.) F. Budi Hardiman, (Yogyakarta, Penerbit Kanisius, 1991)

McGowan, Todd. Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Marets, New York: Columbia University Press, 2016

Mirowski, Philip & Plehwe, Dietere. The Road From Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2009)

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1st edition) Boston: Beacon Press, 1944 [1957]

________. The Livelihood of Man: Studies in Social Discontinuity, (ed.) Harry W. Pearson, New York: Academic Press, 1977

________. Primitive, Archaic, and Modern Economies, George Dalton (ed), New York: Anchor, 1968

Polanyi, Karl. M. Arensberg, Conrad. & W. Person, Harry (ed.). Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economic in History and Theory, (USA: The Free Press, 1957)

Polanyi-Levitt, Karl & Mendell, Marguerite. “Karl Polanyi: His Life and Times”, dalam Studies in Political Economy, Vol. 22, No.1 (Spring 1987)

Prastowo, Yustinus. “Gerak-Ganda: Sebuah Pemecahan Etis atas Konsep Pasar”, dalam Respons (Jurnal Etika Sosial), vol. 15, no. 02, Desember 2010, 251-286

Runesi, Wilhelmus F. Ninu. “Nekro-Ekonomi: Menafsir Kepunahan, Mensiasati Masa Depan”, dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sanata Dharma Berbagi, Vol 3, 2025, https://e-conf.usd.ac.id/index.php/usdb, 501-514

Sarup, Madan. An Introductory Guide to Post-Strukturalism and Postmodernism, (Georgia: The University of Georgia Press, 1993)

Sen, Amartya. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981

Stiglitz, Joseph. Sen, Amartya & Fituossi, Jean-Paul. Mengukur Kesejahteraan: Mengapa Produk Domestik Bruto Bukan Tolok Ukur yang Tepat untuk Menilai Kemajuan?, Jakarta: Penerbit Marjin Kiri, 2011

Stiglitz, Joseph. Globalization and its Discontents, London: W.W Norton & Company, 2002

Stiglitz, Joseph. The Roaring Ninties: Why We’re Paying the Price for the Greediest Decade in History, (London: Penguin Books, 2003)

Supelli, Karlina. “Sains sebagai Keselamatan dalam Pandangan Francis Bacon”, dalam Diskursus: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi, Vol. 14, No. 1, April 2015, 101-140

Taryadi, Alfons. Epistemologi Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Karl R. Popper, Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia, 1989

Yuran, Noam. What Money Wants: An Economic of Desire, Stanford University Press, 2014

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

“Menggugat Logika Pembangunan: Kritik Karl Polanyi Atas Kelangkaan Sebagai Desain Kekuasaan”. Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi 17, no. 1 (April 27, 2026). Accessed June 29, 2026. https://www.journal.unwira.ac.id/index.php/LUMENVERITATIS/article/view/4695.