A modified technique to predict speech privacy and distraction distances in open-plan offices

Sentagi Sesotya Utami; Joko Sarwono; Zulfi Aulia Rachman

doi:10.30822/arteks.v8i2.1626

Penulis

Sentagi Sesotya Utami Engineering Physics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , Engineering Physics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8338-1336 (tidak diautentikasi)
Joko Sarwono Engineering Physics, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia , Engineering Physics, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Zulfi Aulia Rachman Engineering Physics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , Engineering Physics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-247X (tidak diautentikasi)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i2.1626

Kata Kunci:

ISO 3382-3:2012, Jarak gangguan, Jarak privasi, Ruang kantor terbuka, Stasiun kerja

Abstrak

Standar ISO 3382-3:2012 telah menyediakan teknik terstandardisasi untuk meningkatkan kualitas akustik ruang kantor terbuka untuk sumber dengan stasiun kerja yang diatur dalam susunan garis lurus. Ruang kantor terbuka dengan pengaturan non-blok membutuhkan pendekatan yang berbeda. Artikel ini menunjukkan teknik termodifikasi dengan menggunakan hubungan antara Speech Transmission Index (STI) dan persentase hilangnya artikulasi konsonan (%Alcons). Nilai Indeks Transmisi Suara (STI) yang dikehendaki untuk memprediksi privasi ucapan dan jarak gangguan dihasilkan menggunakan metode ISO 3382-3:2012. Berdasarkan perhitungan ISO 3382-3:2012, kedua pengaturan percobaan menunjukkan kondisi akustik yang buruk dengan Lp,A,S,4m? 50 dBA. Setelah melakukan evaluasi, hasil dengan menggunakan hubungan antara %Alcons dan STI menunjukkan beberapa pulau berpotensi sebagai ruang percakapan pribadi di tata letak percobaan pengaturan-1 dari 6% pulau, dan tidak ada untuk pengaturan-2. Sedangkan persentase gangguan kerja untuk percobaan setup-1 dan setup-2 masing-masing sebesar 79% dan 100%. Teknik yang dimodifikasi ini memungkinkan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas privasi percakapan dalam ruang kantor terbuka tanpa kendala pada tata letak furnitur.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Acun, Volkan, and Semiha Yilmazer. 2018. ‘A Grounded Theory Approach to Investigate the Perceived Soundscape of Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 131 (February): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.09.018.

Aulia, Titania, Yohanes Karyadi Kusliansjah, and Hartanto Budiyuwono. 2021. ‘The Effect of Public Park Boundary Order on the Environmental Control of Local Government Central Offices’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (3): 349–62. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.833.

Bistafa, Sylvio R., and John S. Bradley. 2000. ‘Revisiting Algorithms for Predicting the Articulation Loss of Consonants Alcons’. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 48 (6): 531–44. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id=c86b9967-2c2f-4009-ba1e-5faf3e32c488.

Cabrera, Densil, Manuj Yadav, and Daniel Protheroe. 2018. ‘Critical Methodological Assessment of the Distraction Distance Used for Evaluating Room Acoustic Quality of Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 140 (November): 132–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.016.

Christensen, Claus Lynge, George Koutsouris, and Jens Holger Rindel. 2013. ‘The ISO 3382 Parameters: Can We Simulate Them? Can We Measure Them?’ In International Symposium on Room Acoustics, 1–26. Toronto, Canada: ISRA. https://www.odeon.dk/pdf/ISRA2013_Paper_The ISO 3382 parameters_Can we simulate them_Can we measure them_24July2013.pdf.

Davis, Don, Eugene Patronis, and Pat Brown. 2013. Sound System Engineering. 4th ed. England, UK: Routledge.

Ebissou, Ange, Etienne Parizet, and Patrick Chevret. 2015. ‘Use of the Speech Transmission Index for the Assessment of Sound Annoyance in Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 88 (February): 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.07.012.

Haapakangas, Annu, Valtteri Hongisto, Jukka Hyönä, Joonas Kokko, and Jukka Keränen. 2014. ‘Effects of Unattended Speech on Performance and Subjective Distraction: The Role of Acoustic Design in Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 86 (December): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.04.018.

Haapakangas, Annu, Valtteri Hongisto, Johanna Varjo, and Marjaana Lahtinen. 2018. ‘Benefits of Quiet Workspaces in Open-Plan Offices – Evidence from Two Office Relocations’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 56 (April): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.03.003.

Hongisto, Valtteri, and Jukka Keränen. 2021. ‘Comfort Distance—A Single-Number Quantity Describing Spatial Attenuation in Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Sciences 11 (10): 4596. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104596.

Hongisto, Valtteri, Jukka Keränen, Laura Labia, and Reijo Alakoivu. 2021. ‘Precision of ISO 3382-2 and ISO 3382-3 – A Round-Robin Test in an Open-Plan Office’. Applied Acoustics 175 (April): 107846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107846.

International Organization for Standardization. 2012. Acoustics - Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters - Part 3: Open Plan Offices. Geneva. https://www.iso.org/standard/77437.html.

Jahncke, Helena, Valtteri Hongisto, and Petra Virjonen. 2013. ‘Cognitive Performance during Irrelevant Speech: Effects of Speech Intelligibility and Office-Task Characteristics’. Applied Acoustics 74 (3): 307–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.08.007.

Jahncke, Helena, Staffan Hygge, Niklas Halin, Anne Marie Green, and Kenth Dimberg. 2011. ‘Open-Plan Office Noise: Cognitive Performance and Restoration’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (4): 373–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002.

Jeon, Jin Yong, Hyun In Jo, Beta Bayu Santika, and Haram Lee. 2022. ‘Crossed Effects of Audio-Visual Environment on Indoor Soundscape Perception for Pleasant Open-Plan Office Environments’. Building and Environment 207 (January): 108512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108512.

Keränen, J., and V. Hongisto. 2013. ‘Prediction of the Spatial Decay of Speech in Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 74 (12): 1315–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.05.011.

Keränen, Jukka, Jarkko Hakala, and Valtteri Hongisto. 2020. ‘Effect of Sound Absorption and Screen Height on Spatial Decay of Speech – Experimental Study in an Open-Plan Office’. Applied Acoustics 166 (September): 107340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107340.

Kim, Jungsoo, and Richard de Dear. 2013. ‘Workspace Satisfaction: The Privacy-Communication Trade-off in Open-Plan Offices’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36 (December): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007.

Park, Sang Hee, Pyoung Jik Lee, Byung Kwon Lee, Michael Roskams, and Barry P. Haynes. 2020. ‘Associations between Job Satisfaction, Job Characteristics, and Acoustic Environment in Open-Plan Offices’. Applied Acoustics 168 (November): 107425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107425.

Peutz, V. M. A. 1971. ‘Articulation Loss of Consonants as a Criterion for Speech Transmission in a Room’. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 19 (11): 915–19. https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=2108.

Rindel, Jens Holger. 2018. ‘Open Plan Office Acoustics -- a Multidimensional Optimization Problem’. In DAGA, 394–97. Munchen: DAGA. https://pub.dega-akustik.de/DAGA_2018/data/articles/000419.pdf.

Sander, Elizabeth (Libby) J., Cecelia Marques, James Birt, Matthew Stead, and Oliver Baumann. 2021. ‘Open-Plan Office Noise Is Stressful: Multimodal Stress Detection in a Simulated Work Environment’. Journal of Management & Organization 27 (6): 1021–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.17.

Utami, Sentagi Sesotya. 2014. ‘Speech Privacy and Intelligibility in Open-Plan Offices as an Impact of Sound-Field Diffuseness’. In 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, 1–9. Melbourne, Australia: INTERNOISE. https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/INTERNOISE2014/papers/p929.pdf.

Utami, Sentagi Sesotya, Dhany Arifianto, and Ainun Nadiroh. 2017. ‘Study on the Effect of Partition Heights in Open Plan Office to the Privacy and Distraction Level Utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics’. Procedia Engineering 170: 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.046.

Utami, Sentagi Sesotya, Aji Kurniawan, Abdul H. Mahmudin, and Joko Sarwono. 2013. ‘Characterizing the Acoustics of “Green” Open-Plan Office’. In The 20th International Conference on Sound and Vibration (ICSV), 2451–58. Bangkok Thailand: International Institute of Acoustics & Vibration. http://toc.proceedings.com/19660webtoc.pdf.

Yadav, Manuj, Jungsoo Kim, Densil Cabrera, and Richard de Dear. 2017. ‘Auditory Distraction in Open-Plan Office Environments: The Effect of Multi-Talker Acoustics’. Applied Acoustics 126 (November): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.011.

Yıldırım, Kemal, Elif Güneş, and Gülcan Pervan Yilmaz. 2019. ‘The Effects of Workstation Partition Heights on Employees’ Perceptions in Open-Plan Ofﬁces’. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 21 (2): 148–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-03-2018-0010.

Zaglauer, Maria, Horst Drotleff, and Andreas Liebl. 2017. ‘Background Babble in Open-Plan Offices: A Natural Masker of Disruptive Speech?’ Applied Acoustics 118 (March): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.11.004.