The effect of public park boundary order on the environmental control of local government central offices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.833

Keywords:

Boundaries, City government centers, Control, Offices, Public parks

Abstract

The existence of park facilities as public open spaces is a phenomenon of development activities that are much done, referring to the need for interaction space for the community. The function of the park in its development cannot be separated from the historical value since the colonial era, where its existence is a form of providing green open space oriented to parks in Europe. Seeing the reality of its development, the park facilities now are not only built in the city enclave, but also penetrate into formal environments such as government offices. Bandung, Surabaya and Semarang are the 3 (three) examples of capitals in Indonesia that carried out that development, which are the City Hall complex. The two facilities located in one area can encourage issues regarding the borders of public parks which accommodate informal activities over the control of the city government center office environment structure as an existing building that accommodates formal activities. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative through an analytical approach based on theory. The analysis is carried out by observing the landscape layout and functions since its inception in order to find out what aspects are maintained or transformed. After that, regarding the ownership of the elements of its present spatial borders. Based on research, Bandung, Surabaya, and Semarang City Hall shows that the existence of public parks in an office environment results in an arrangement that can influence the overall arrangement and user movement pattern of the environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bukit, Elya Santa, Himasari Hanan, and Arif Sarwo Wibowo. 2012. ‘Aplikasi Metode N. J. Habraken Pada Studi Transformasi Permukiman Tradisional’. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (JLBI) 1 (1): 51–62. https://jlbi.iplbi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/V1N1-p051-p062-Aplikasi-Metoda-N.J.-Habraken-pada-Studi-Transformasi-Permukiman-Tradisional.pdf.

Ching, Francis D. K. 2007. Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dianty, Grace Putri, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2020. ‘Aktivitas Di Alun-Alun Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Publik Dengan Konsep Lapangan, Kasus Studi: Alun-Alun Bandung’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.116.

Garvin, Alexander. 2011. Public Parks, The Key to Livable Communities. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.

Habraken, N. John. 1998. The Structure of the Ordinary, Form and Control in the Built Environment. Edited by Jonathan Teicher. Paperback. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://www.habraken.com/html/structure_of_the_ordinary.htm.

Hanan, Himasari. 2013. ‘Open Space as Meaningful Place for Students in ITB Campus’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85 (September): 308–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.361.

Handinoto. 1993. ‘Arsitek G. C. Citroen Dan Perkembangan Arsitektur Kolonial Belanda Di Surabaya (1915-1940)’. Dimensi 19: 1–16. https://adoc.pub/arsitek-gc-citroen-dan-perkembangan-arsitektur-kolonial-bela.html.

Hantono, Dedi. 2019. ‘Kajian Perilaku Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik’. NALARs 18 (1): 45. https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.18.1.45-56.

Harahap, Akhir Matua. 2017. ‘Poestaha Depok’. Poestaha Depok. 2017. https://poestahadepok.blogspot.com/search?q=Harahap.

Hartoyo, Hansen, and Santoni. 2018. ‘Kriteria Ruang Publik Kalijodo Pendukung Aksesibilitas Dan Peningkatan Aktivitas’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 2 (2): 113–24. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v2i1.45.

Hidayati, Hana Eka, and Roni Sugiarto. 2020. ‘Peran Tatanan Elemen Arsitektural Terhadap Pembentukan Soundscape Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik Balai Kota Bandung’. Riset Arsitektur (RISA) 4 (04): 350–62. https://doi.org/10.26593/risa.v4i04.3938.350-362.

Irfandi, Mirza, Irzaidi, and Khairul Huda. 2017. ‘Pengaruh Kualitas Fisik Ruang Terbuka Publik Aktif Perkotaan Terhadap Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat’. In Temu Ilmiah Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia 6, A023–30. Banda Aceh: Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.32315/ti.6.a023.

Irwanto, Deny. 2017. ‘Proyek Taman Balai Kota Senilai Rp 1,7 Miliar Membuat Kecewa Hevearita, Begini Alasanya’. BeritaSemarang. 2017. https://www.beritasemarang.net/proyek-taman-balai-kota-senilai-rp-17-miliar-membuat-kecewa-hevearita-begini-alasanya/5087/.

Kunto, Harjoto. 1984. Wajah Bandoeng Tempoe Doeloe. Bandung: Granesia.

Laguerre, Michel S. 1994. The Informal City. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.

Liem, Yoseph, and Reginaldo Chistophori Lake. 2018. ‘Pemaknaan Ruang Terbuka Publik Taman Nostalgia Kota Kupang’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 2 (2): 149–58. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v2i1.48.

Maslow, Abraham. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.

Suriastuti, Mira Zulia, Deddy Wahjudi, and Bagus Handoko. 2014. ‘Kajian Penerapan Konsep Kearifan Lokal Pada Perancangan Arsitektur Balaikota Bandung’. Jurnal Itenas Rekarupa 2 (1): 122–28. http://jurnalonline.itenas.ac.id/index.php/rekarupa/article/view/710.

Trancik, Roger. 1986. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. Finding Lost Space. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Viantara, Risma. 2020. ‘Analisis Taman Tematik Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Publik Di Kota Bandung’. Geoplanart 3 (1): 46–56.

Wibowo, Ari, and Mangasa Ritonga. 2018. ‘Kebutuhan Pengembangan Standar Nasional Indonesia Fasilitas Taman Kota’. Jurnal Standardisasi 18 (3): 161. https://doi.org/10.31153/js.v18i3.234.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

“The Effect of Public Park Boundary Order on the Environmental Control of Local Government Central Offices”. 2021. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (3): 349-62. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.833.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>