Studio oriented learning environment method to improve student learning quality in interior design studio

Main Article Content

Ully Hanafiah
Doddy Friestya Asharsinyo

Abstract

Due to the complexity of activities and interior elements in the studio-oriented learning environment, it is essential to apply the right method in all stages to ensure they proceed sequentially and systematically. This is because presently the in-depth design method associated with this learning environment has not been fully explored to fulfill user needs in accordance with the design project. Therefore, this research aims to determine the right method used to improve students learning quality in the teaching process at the Interior Design studio, to obtain better responses. This research was carried out using the CAR model proposed by Kemmis and Mc Taggart consisting of four components, namely planning, action, observation, and reflection. The result showed that after the re-planning process, a reflection in the form of a separate cycle is conducted. Furthermore, independent learning methods in a conducive environment are carried out based on the Studio Oriented Learning Environment (SOLE) method, with assessments conducted by lecturers and students in each assistance group. This research has the ability to improve students thinking ability sequentially and systematically, as well as increase their participation and collaboration in producing quality designs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hanafiah, Ully, and Doddy Friestya Asharsinyo. 2021. “Studio Oriented Learning Environment Method to Improve Student Learning Quality in Interior Design Studio”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (2), 165-74. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.455.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH

References

Carolina, and Amandus Jong Tallo. 2018. ‘Workshop to Increase the Number of Students at Engineering Study Program’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 2 (2): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v2i1.43.
Ching, Francis D. K. 2007. Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chressetianto, Ayhwien. 2013. ‘Pengaruh Aksesoris Dan Elemen Pembentuk Ruang Terhadap Suasana Dan Karakter Interior Lobi Hotel Artotel Surabaya’. Jurnal Intra 1 (1): 1–7. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/103420-ID-pengaruh-aksesoris-dan-elemen-pembentuk.pdf.
Dewi, Savitri Kartika, Elvina Kurniawati Haryanto, and Sherly De Yong. 2018. ‘Identifikasi Penerapan Design Thinking Dalam Pembelajaran Perancangan Desain Interior Kantor’. In Konvergensi Keilmuan Seni Rupa Dan Desain Era 4.0, 33–38. Surabaya: FBS Unesa. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/266504-identifikasi-penerapan-design-thinking-d-e8189f93.pdf.
Irsyadi, Nur. 1985. Proses Perancangan Yang Sistematis Laporan Seminar Tata Lingkungan Mahasiswa Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Komariah, Aan. 2018. ‘Seminar Penelitian Tindakan Kelas’. Bandung.
Sudradjat, Iwan. 2020. ‘Theory in Architectural Research’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): i–vi. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.378.
Sukada, Nabila, and Purnama Salura. 2020. ‘Basic Architectural Expression of a Cultural Center, Study Object: Volkstheater Sobokartti in Semarang, Indonesia’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.76.
Sutedjo, Christian, and Hedy Constancia Indrani. 2014. ‘Perancangan Interior Studio Program Studi Desain Interior Gedung P2 Universitas Kristen Petra Di Surabaya’. Jurnal Intra 2 (2): 414–20. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/90440-ID-perancangan-interior-studio-program-stud.pdf.
Wardani, Laksmi Kusuma. 2003. ‘Berpikir Kritis Kreatif (Sebuah Model Pendidikan Di Bidang Desain Interior)’. Dimensi Interior 1 (2): 97–111. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/217807-berpikir-kritis-kreatif-sebuah-model-pen.pdf.
Zairul, Mohd. 2018a. ‘Emphasising Paragogy and Cybergogy in the Architectural Studio through the S.O.L.E Approach: A Formulation of a New Theory of Studiogogy’. In Trends & Issues in Higher Education, 35–44. Selangor: Centre for Academic Development (CADe) Canselori Putra Building Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang.
———. 2018b. ‘Introducing Studio Oriented Learning Environment (SOLE) in UPM Serdang: Accessing Student-Centered Learning (SCL) In the Architectural Studio’. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 12 (1): 241–50.