The meaning of comfort and security from occupant’s perspective

Main Article Content

Danti Arinta Hapsari
Hanson Endra Kusuma
Rizki Dwika Aprilian
Allis Nurdini

Abstract

Currently, the design of unfenced houses is an option that is equal to the number of people who prefer fenced houses. The preference of housing design has various qualities and environmental disturbances that have impacts on the comfort and security felt by occupants. This study aims to identify the meaning of comfort and security from occupant’s perspective against the choosing of housing concept. The research was carried out in two steps, the first step was performed qualitatively with an open-ended questionnaire. The second step of research was continued quantitatively by collecting data using an online questionnaire with close-ended questions. The results of the data collected were analyzed using factor analysis and multivariate regression analysis. The final result of the research found that the presence of a fenced or unfenced did not affect the meaning of comfort and security in the dwellings. Factors from environmental disturbances also did not affect the comfort and safety of occupants in choosing the type of housing where occupants already understand the situation that is being completely limited. This is very closely related to the pandemic situation when the research was carried out. The meaning of comfort and security is more influenced by the ability of the occupants themselves to adapt doing activities in their homes or in their territorial environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hapsari, Danti Arinta, Hanson Endra Kusuma, Rizki Dwika Aprilian, and Allis Nurdini. 2023. “The Meaning of Comfort and Security from occupant’s Perspective”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i1.1599.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH

References

Abadi, A. Adib. 2008. ‘Menuju Lingkungan Perumahan Perkotaan Yang Berkualitas: Belajar Dari Fenomena Kekosongan Perumahan Menengah Ke Bawah’. In ECO URBAN DESIGN: Potensi Dan Tantangan Perencanaan Kota Kota Indonesia Di Masa Mendatang, 1–10. Semarang: Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11736775.pdf?repositoryId=379.
Awanis, Syifa, Hemy Heryati Anward, and Rika Vira Zwagery. 2018. ‘Perbedaan Perilaku Teritorial Pemilik Rumah Berpagar Dan Tidak Di Perumahan Tidak Berpagar Serta Rumah Berpagar Di Perumahan Berpagar’. Jurnal Kognisia 1 (1): 110–14. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journals/index.php/kog/article/view/1465.
Baba, Hiroki, and Kimihiro Hino. 2019. ‘Factors and Tendencies of Housing Abandonment: An Analysis of a Survey of Vacant Houses in Kawaguchi City, Saitama’. Japan Architectural Review 2 (3): 367–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12088.
Blandy, Sarah. 2018. ‘Gated Communities Revisited: Defended Homes Nested in Security Enclaves’. People, Place and Policy Online 11 (3): 136–42. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.2017.2683778298.
Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. California: SAGE Publications.
Cséfalvay, Zoltán, and Chris Webster. 2012. ‘Gates or No Gates? A Cross-European Enquiry into the Driving Forces behind Gated Communities’. Regional Studies 46 (3): 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.505917.
Dian Saraswati, Ratih, and Maria Damiana Nestri Kiswari. 2019. ‘Pagar Dari Teritori Menjadi Pride Dan Identitas’. Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual Dan Media Baru 1 (2): 65–71. http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/tuturrupa/article/view/1949.
Frederick, Tyler J., Michal Chwalek, Jean Hughes, Jeff Karabanow, and Sean Kidd. 2014. ‘HOW STABLE IS STABLE? DEFINING AND MEASURING HOUSING STABILITY’. Journal of Community Psychology 42 (8): 964–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21665.
Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten, and Sarah J. Darby. 2018. ‘“Home Is Where the Smart Is”? Evaluating Smart Home Research and Approaches against the Concept of Home’. Energy Research & Social Science 37 (March): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.037.
Groat, Linda N., and David Wang. 2013. Architectural Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hamzah, Amir, and Ferry Anderson. 2020. ‘Study Eksploratif Tingkat Kepuasan Penghuni Terhadap Kondisi Bangunan Perumahan Aulya Kota Kisaran Kabupaten Asahan’. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Ilmu Universitas Asahan Ke-4. Sumatera Utara: Universitas Asahan. http://jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/semnasmudi/article/view/1613.
Joo, Heesun, and Soyeong Lee. 2021. ‘Spatial Analysis of Abandoned Houses and Their Influencing Factors in South Korea’. Applied Sciences 11 (18): 8576. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188576.
Kiswari, Maria Damiana Nestri. 2021. ‘Korelasi Antara Pagar Rumah Tinggal Dengan Aktivitas Ruang Publik Di Perumahan Mlaten, Semarang’. Tesa Arsitektur 19 (2): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v19i2.3700.
Kumar, Ranjit. 2005. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Pagani, Anna, and Claudia R. Binder. 2023. ‘A Systems Perspective for Residential Preferences and Dwellings: Housing Functions and Their Role in Swiss Residential Mobility’. Housing Studies 38 (4): 682–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1900793.
Pratami, Ariessa Khalista, and Dwita Hadi Rahmi. 2021. ‘Rumah Sebagai Helioterapi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19’. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia 10 (1): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v10i01.7.
Purbadi, Yohanes Djarot, B. Sumardiyanto, and Vincentia Reni Vitasurya. 2023. ‘Kesinambungan Dan Perbedaan Rumah Sumba Di Dalam Dan Di Luar Praingu’. Archimane 1 (1): 37–52. https://journal.gioarchitect.co.id/index.php/archimane/article/view/4/4.
Rahmawati, Anna Lucy, Liliany Sigit Arifin, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2023. ‘Pendekatan Mimesis Untuk Keberlanjutan Arsitektur Vernakular’. Archimane 1 (1): 23–36. https://journal.gioarchitect.co.id/index.php/archimane/article/view/3/3.
Saraswati, Ratih Dian, and Salma Azhar. 2019. ‘Studi Mengenai Karakteristik Pagar Berdasarkan Klasifikasi Tipe Rumah Tinggal’. PRAXIS 2 (1): 66. https://doi.org/10.24167/praxis.v2i1.2264.
Simbolon, Reinhard. 2019. ‘Perancangan Sistem Keamanan Pintu Masuk Dan Keluar Kendaraan Di Perumahan Golden Simalingkar B Medan’. Jurnal Riset Komputer (JURIKOM) 6 (4): 442–46. http://ejurnal.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/index.php/jurikom%7CPage%7C442.
Siregar, Fernando, Chandra Tanaka, and Andrew Marthin. 2021. ‘Konsep Komunitas Arsitektur Perumahan Real Estate: Kaitannya Dengan Konsep Neighborhood Dan Modal Sosial’. JURNAL ARSITEKTUR 11 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.36448/ja.v11i1.1788.
Syafrina, Andina, Angela Christysonia, Nunik Hasriyanti, Hanson E Kusuma, Magister Arsitektur, Sekolah Arsitektur, and Pengembangan Kebijakan. 2019. ‘Hubungan Antara Kepuasan Berhuni Dan Sikap Terhadap Tempat’. Tesa Arsitektur 17 (2): 81–92. http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/tesa/article/view/1311.
Tarigan, Riandy. 2023. ‘Modernity vs Traditionality: The Approach the Vernacular Architecture in Maintaining Traditional Architecture through Structuralism’. Archimane 1 (1): 1–10. https://journal.gioarchitect.co.id/index.php/archimane/article/view/1/1.
Widyarthara, Adhi. 2017. ‘Konsep Kenyamanan Perumahan Sub Urban’. PAWON: Jurnal Arsitektur 1 (2): 55–63.
Willems, Sara, Henk De Smet, and Ann Heylighen. 2020. ‘Seeking a Balance between Privacy and Connectedness in Housing for Refugees’. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 35 (1): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09727-7.