Adaptive reuse approach towards visual character change in conservation buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1141Keywords:
Adaptive reuse, Conservation, Semarang gallery, Visual characterAbstract
Semarang Gallery resulted from a heritage building conservation project reused with a new function or known as adaptive reuse, which indicates that it can cause changes in its visual character. This study aims to find the level of change in the visual character of the exterior, interior, and at close range of Semarang Gallery due to the adaptive reuse approach. This research uses a qualitative method, with graphical and descriptive data analysis. The results of the analysis show that the adaptive reuse approach changes the existing building typology, which requires adapting to technical improvements in almost all aspects of the building; thus giving rise to changes in the visual character of the exterior, interior, and at close range with different levels of significance. Changes that are in line with conservation principles can increase its parameter function’s value, on the contrary; inconsistencies can remove the distinctiveness of the visual character.
Downloads
References
Aidarova, Galina, and Elza Bashirova. 2020. ‘Regional Architecture of Russia: Kazan - Conflicts of the “Old” and “New”’. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 890 (1): 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012016.
Australia ICOMOS. 2013. ‘The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance’. ICOMOS Open Archive: EPrints on Cultural Heritage. 2013. http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2145/1/ICOMOS-Australia-The-Burra-Charter-2013.pdf.
Disli, Gulsen. 2019. ‘New Additions to Existing Built Heritage and Their Contributions to Sustainable Development: Cases from Ankara, Turkey’. In Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation within Sustainability. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82734.
Grimmer, Anne E., and Kay D. Weeks. 2010. ‘New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns’. Technical Preservation Services. 2010. https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/14-exterior-additions.htm.
Kuipers, M. C., and W. de Jonge. 2017. Designing from Heritage: Strategies for Conservation and Conversion. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Lestari, and Muhammad Ridha Alhamdani. 2014. ‘Penerapan Material Kaca Dalam Arsitektur’. LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v1i2.18798.
Lucchi, Elena. 2020. ‘Environmental Risk Management for Museums in Historic Buildings through an Innovative Approach: A Case Study of the Pinacoteca Di Brera in Milan (Italy)’. Sustainability 12 (12): 5155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125155.
Nelson, Lee H. 1988. ‘Architectural Character—Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character’. Technical Preservation Services. 1988. https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/17-architectural-character.htm.
Panggabean, Sriayu Aritha. 2014. ‘Perubahan Fungsi Dan Struktur Bangunan Cagar Budaya Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Cagar Budaya’. Pandecta: Research Law Journal 9 (2): 173. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i2.3443.
Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad Van Cleempoel. 2012. ‘Creating Sustainable Retail Interiors through the Reuse of Historic Buildings’. Interiors 3 (3): 271–93. https://doi.org/10.2752/204191212X13470263747031.
Purnomo, Hery, Judi O. Waani, and Cynthia E. V. Wuisang. 2017. ‘Gaya & Karakter Visual Arsitektur Kolonial Belanda Di Kawasan Benteng Oranje Ternate’. Media Matrasain 14 (1): 23–33. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jmm/article/view/15443/14987.
Purwantiasning, Ari Widyati, Lily Mauliani, and Wafirul Aqli. 2013. ‘Building Conversion as an Application of Old Building Conservation Comparative Studies: China Town, Singapore–Petak Sembilan, Jakarta’. In Proceeding International Seminar Genius Loci. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2281.3605.
Sari, Sriti Mayang. 2005. ‘Implementasi Pengalaman Ruang Dalam Desain Interior’. Dimensi Interior 3 (2). https://dimensiinterior.petra.ac.id/index.php/int/article/view/16391.
Shahi, Sheida, Mansour Esnaashary Esfahani, Chris Bachmann, and Carl Haas. 2020. ‘A Definition Framework for Building Adaptation Projects’. Sustainable Cities and Society 63 (December): 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102345.
Soeroso, Amiluhur. 2007. ‘Konservasi Saujana Budaya Kawasan Borobudur: Zonasi Ulang Dengan Pendekatan Ekosistem’. Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan 14 (3): 115–26. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/JML/article/view/18669/11962.
Sujana, Adang. 2017. ‘Adaptasi Bangunan Cagar Budaya Perspektif Indonesia’. In Seminar Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, A083–90. Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.1.a083.
Torres, Zasha Natiana Guzmán. 2009. ‘Historic Buildings and Contemporary Additions: The Elements of a Cohesive Design Relationship’. University of Maryland, College Park. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/9408/guzman_DRUM_S09.pdf?sequence=1.
UNESCO Office Jakarta and Kemendikbud RI. 2015. ‘Caring for Your Heritage Building: Building Owner’s Information’. UNESCO Office Jakarta. 2015. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243218/PDF/243218eng.pdf.multi.
W. Maer, Bisatya, Benjamin Lumantarna, and Joyce M. Laurens. 2012. ‘Penataan Elemen Struktural Untuk Menyederhanakan Perilaku Dinamik, Dalam Keterpaduan Dengan Desain Arsitektur’. DIMENSI (Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur) 38 (1). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.38.1.43-54.
Wong, Liliane. 2016. Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. 1st ed. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
