Effectiveness of adaptive facade with helicone mechanisms on energy values and natural lighting in Indonesia

Aldhi Nugraha Anantama; Agus Hariyadi

doi:10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1071

Authors

Aldhi Nugraha Anantama Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada , Departmen Teknik Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Agus Hariyadi Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada , Departmen Teknik Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-3790 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1071

Keywords:

Climate adaptive building shell, Modeling, Parametric, Simulation

Abstract

The annual growth of energy consumption in both residential and public buildings has been established globally as been significantly increasing. Therefore, the proposed active and passive building designs are intended to provide convenience and greatly reduce the high energy requirements, before considering mechanical systems (associated with fossil fuel-based energy consumption). This encourages the development of a new design, such as the Climate Adaptive Building Shell (CABS). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of CABS with Helicone mechanisms on energy and natural lighting, as well as its influential factors. The parametric modeling simulation method was applied to compare the energy and natural lighting aspects, between the adaptive and static facades of the Helicone mechanism. The results indicated that the adaptive facade was more effective than the static, based on energy and natural lighting. It was also found that the 30° adaptive configuration with the Helicone mechanism was the most effective. These results were influenced by several factors, i.e., the small turning angle (30° and 150° (-30°) and the anticlockwise direction of the adaptive facade rotation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahdad, Ali Ahmed Salem, Sharifah Fairuz Syed Fadzil, and Nooriati Taib. 2020. ‘Optimization of Daylight Performance Based on Controllable Light-Shelf Parameters Using Genetic Algorithms in the Tropical Climate of Malaysia’. Journal of Daylighting 7 (1): 122–36. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2020.10.

Hariyadi, Agus, Hiroatsu Fukuda, and Qingsong Ma. 2017. ‘The Effectiveness of the Parametric Design “Sudare” Blind as External Shading for Energy Efficiency and Visibility Quality in Jakarta’. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 13 (5): 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2017.1296811.

Hariyadi, Agus, Esti Setyaning Jati, Nabila Afif, and Alya Farah Taufiqoh. 2021. ‘The Comparison of Device Materials of Sliding Sudare Using a Prototyping Method’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.569.

Hosseini, Seyed Morteza, Masi Mohammadi, Alexander Rosemann, Torsten Schröder, and Jos Lichtenberg. 2019. ‘A Morphological Approach for Kinetic Façade Design Process to Improve Visual and Thermal Comfort: Review’. Building and Environment 153 (April): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040.

Hwang, Ruey-Lung, Wen-Mei Shih, Tzu-Ping Lin, and Kuo-Tsang Huang. 2018. ‘Simplification and Adjustment of the Energy Consumption Indices of Office Building Envelopes in Response to Climate Change’. Applied Energy 230 (November): 460–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.090.

Jayathissa, P., J. Zarb, M. Luzzatto, J. Hofer, and A. Schlueter. 2017. ‘Sensitivity of Building Properties and Use Types for the Application of Adaptive Photovoltaic Shading Systems’. Energy Procedia 122 (September): 139–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.319.

Kim, Hyoungsub, and Mark J. Clayton. 2020. ‘A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Climate-Adaptive Building Envelope Design Using Parametric Behavior Maps’. Building and Environment 185 (November): 107292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107292.

Loonen, R.C.G.M., M. Trčka, D. Cóstola, and J.L.M. Hensen. 2013. ‘Climate Adaptive Building Shells: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25 (September): 483–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016.

Mols, Toms, and Andra Blumberga. 2020. ‘Inverse Modelling of Climate Adaptive Building Shells. System Dynamics Approach’. Environmental and Climate Technologies 24 (2): 170–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0064.

Mols, Toms, Andra Blumberga, and Ieva Karklina. 2017. ‘Evaluation of Climate Adaptive Building Shells: Multi-Criteria Analysis’. Energy Procedia 128 (September): 292–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.077.

Nabil, Azza, and John Mardaljevic. 2006. ‘Useful Daylight Illuminances: A Replacement for Daylight Factors’. Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 905–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.

Natephra, Worawan, Nobuyoshi Yabuki, and Tomohiro Fukuda. 2018. ‘Optimizing the Evaluation of Building Envelope Design for Thermal Performance Using a BIM-Based Overall Thermal Transfer Value Calculation’. Building and Environment 136 (May): 128–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.032.

Neufert, Ernest. 2002. Data Arsitek. 33rd ed. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ricci, Adele, Caterina Ponzio, Kristian Fabbri, Jacopo Gaspari, and Emanuele Naboni. 2021. ‘Development of a Self-Sufficient Dynamic Façade within the Context of Climate Change’. Architectural Science Review 64 (1–2): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1713042.

Ricci, Adele, Caterina Ponzio, Jacopo Gaspari, and Emanuele Naboni. 2019. ‘A Study on the Impact of Climate Adaptive Building Shells on Indoor Comfort’. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 7 (1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2019.1.2778.

Richman-Abdou, Kelly. 2018. ‘Kinetic Toy Transforms From a Pinecone to a Helix with the Simple Flick of a Wrist’. My Modern Met. 2018. https://mymodernmet.com/john-edmark-helicone/.

Rizi, Rana Abdollahi, and Ahmad Eltaweel. 2021. ‘A User Detective Adaptive Facade towards Improving Visual and Thermal Comfort’. Journal of Building Engineering 33 (January): 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101554.

Seputra, Jackobus Ade Prasetya. 2018. ‘Numeric Analysis of Air Distribution in Air-Conditioned Room to Obtain Optimum Energy Effeciency Level’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i1.53.

Shahin, Hadeer Samir Mohamed. 2019. ‘Adaptive Building Envelopes of Multistory Buildings as an Example of High Performance Building Skins’. Alexandria Engineering Journal 58 (1): 345–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.11.013.

Soflaei, Farzaneh, Mehdi Shokouhian, Amir Tabadkani, Hamed Moslehi, and Umberto Berardi. 2020. ‘A Simulation-Based Model for Courtyard Housing Design Based on Adaptive Thermal Comfort’. Journal of Building Engineering 31 (September): 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101335.

Tabadkani, Amir, Masoud Valinejad Shoubi, Farzaneh Soflaei, and Saeed Banihashemi. 2019. ‘Integrated Parametric Design of Adaptive Facades for User’s Visual Comfort’. Automation in Construction 106 (October): 102857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102857.

Yamín Garretón, Julieta, Ayelén María Villalba, Roberto Germán Rodriguez, and Andrea Pattini. 2021. ‘Roller Blinds Characterization Assessing Discomfort Glare, View Outside and Useful Daylight Illuminance with the Sun in the Field of View’. Solar Energy 213 (January): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.027.

Yan, Shuai, Xianting Li, Baolong Wang, Wenxing Shi, and Weihua Lyu. 2019. ‘A Method to Describe the Thermal Property of Pipe-Embedded Double-Skin Façade: Equivalent Glass Window’. Energy and Buildings 195 (July): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.04.041