COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS APPROACH AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/6xvdxh09Keywords:
Cognitive linguistics; language learning; cognitive grammar; conceptual metaphors; language educationAbstract
The importance of understanding the relationship between language and cognition in language teaching has become a significant challenge, particularly in developing a more relevant and effective approach for students. This study aims to analyze the application of cognitive linguistics in language learning. The approach used is qualitative with a literature review method to explore cognitive linguistic theories and their application in language teaching. The main data sources come from academic articles, books, and scientific journals published in leading international databases. Through a systematic literature review, this study identifies how cognitive linguistic theories, such as cognitive grammar, conceptual metaphors, and mental schemas, are applied in the language teaching process. The findings show that cognitive linguistics can enrich language teaching by linking language concepts with cognitive processes and students' real-world experiences. Additionally, this study reveals the challenges in integrating cognitive linguistics theories into existing language education curriculum. The drawn conclusion indicates that the application of cognitive linguistics can enhance students' language comprehension and skills, although its implementation requires deeper adjustments in teaching practices.
Downloads
References
Alduais, A., Al-Khawlani, A., Almaghlouth, S., & Alfadda, H. (2022). Cognitive Linguistics: Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains. In Journal of Intelligence (Vol. 10, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040093
Baranova, E., Rubtsova, D., Rumyantseva, N., Voropaeva, Y., & Semanina, A. (2021). Considering cognitive styles when teaching the language to representatives of different cultures. E3S Web of Conferences, 284, 9009. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128409009
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
Chandler, D. (1994). The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.
Chibaya, C. (2019). A Metaphor-Based Approach for Introducing Programming Concepts. Proceedings - 2019 International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference, IMITEC 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC45504.2019.9015888
Chomsky, N. (1953). Systems of syntactic analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2267409
Christison, M., & Murray, D. E. (2021). What English language teachers need to know volume III (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429275746
Collier, G. A., Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1973). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. In Language (Vol. 49, Issue 1). Univ of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/412128
de Saussure, F. (2023). Writings in General Linguistics. In Writings in General Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199261444.001.0001
DOHMAN, Ü. (2022). KuramsalYönleri̇ylBi̇li̇şsDi̇lbi̇li̇m. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(43), 1235–1259. https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1037676
Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575–582.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2018). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2011). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language (pp. 79–94). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895698.79
Feng, Q. (2023). A Study of Embodied-Cognitive Teaching Approach to Teach English Reading in College. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 6(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.6.1.160.2023
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm/Hanshin.
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage publications.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. MIT press.
G. B., N., & N., K. (2020). Cognitive Linguistics In Language Learning Process. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 02(12), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue12-70
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.55
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago UP.
Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago press.
Kronenfeld, D. B., Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1978). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. In Language (Vol. 54, Issue 3). Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.2307/412850
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(80)80017-6
Langacker, R. W. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. In Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609
Miao, Z. (2023). Metaphor in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching and its Implications. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 5(2), p85. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v5n2p85
Mondal, P. (2020). Cognition from Language or Language from Cognition? In Language, Biology and Cognition (pp. 97–140). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23715-8_3
Moreno Mojica, J. A. (2016). La lingüística cognitiva: una aproximación al abordaje del lenguaje como fenómeno cognitivo integrado. Análisis, 48(88), 41. https://doi.org/10.15332/s0120-8454.2016.0088.02
Motov, S. V. (2022). Cognitive linguistics in foreign language teaching: problems and prospects (by the example of teaching English at a language university). Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 4, 923–938. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-4-923-938
Muskat-Tabakowska, E. (2023). Cognitive Linguistics Explains What Happened to the Russian Tank. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.1.97-107
Piaget, J. (2003). Part I: Cognitive Development in Children--Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40.
Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education.
Robbins, M. (2018). Consciousness, language, and self: Psychoanalytic, linguistic, and anthropological explorations of the dual nature of mind. In Consciousness, Language, and Self: Psychoanalytic, Linguistic, and Anthropological Explorations of the Dual Nature of Mind. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351039628
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
Turakhonova, G. B. (2022). Theoretical Fundamentals of the Concept in Cognitive Linguistics. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 03(01), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-03-01-07
Urunbaevna, S. F. (2023). Langacker’S Cognitive Grammar. International Journal Of Literature And Languages, 03(02), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/volume03issue02-01
Villani, C., Orsoni, M., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2022). Abstract and concrete concepts in conversation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 17572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20785-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.
Wei, S. (2023). Application of Cognitive Linguistics Theory and New Interpretation of Second Language Teaching. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 58–59. https://doi.org/10.7753/ijsea1203.1021
Weinert, S. (2022). Language and Cognition. In Language Development: Individual Differences in a Social Context (pp. 122–143). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643719.008
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 7780–7785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701644104
Wirag, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, B. (2022). Applying cognitive linguistics to foreign language teaching and learning. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21010.wir
Zaghlool, Z. D. M., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024). Aligning Translation Curricula with Technological Advancements; Insights from Artificial Intelligence Researchers and Language Educators. Studies in Media and Communication, 12, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i1.6378
Zhou, T. Y. (2018). Applied research on cognitive linguistic philosophy in chinese teaching. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(5), 2373–2385. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.136
