Laweyan cultural heritage in Surakarta: Conceptual revitalization guidelines

Naniek Widayati Priyomarsono; Samsu Hendra Siwi; Rudy Surya

doi:10.30822/arteks.v11i2.5144

Authors

Naniek Widayati Priyomarsono Tarumanagara University
Samsu Hendra Siwi Tarumanagara University
Rudy Surya Tarumanagara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i2.5144

Keywords:

Cultural heritage, Guidelines, Laweyan, Revitalization

Abstract

The Laweyan district in Surakarta is formally designated as a cultural heritage precinct in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Culture and Tourism No. PM.03/PW.007/MKP/2010. Its distinctiveness is articulated through its historical significance, morphological characteristics, and socio-cultural dimensions. Between 1521 and 1546, Laweyan functioned as a perdikan territory, an autonomous enclave exempt from royal taxation, under the leadership of Kyai Ageng Henies. Within this historical framework, the Laweyan community developed a reputation for economic self-sufficiency, particularly as batik entrepreneurs, thereby reinforcing its contemporary identity as a Batik Village. The central issue addressed in this study is the absence of a comprehensive framework to guide the revitalization of the area, a condition that raises serious concerns regarding its sustainable development as a site of considerable historical value. Accordingly, the objective of this research is to formulate a set of revitalization guidelines for heritage areas that can function as a normative reference, ensuring that future interventions remain consistent with the regulatory provisions established in Law No. 11 of 2010. Methodologically, this study adopts a grounded theory approach. The collected data are systematically categorized and coded, followed by interpretative analysis grounded in the theoretical constructs of preservation, conservation, and revitalization. The findings of this research are intended to provide a structured guideline for the revitalization of the Laweyan district, thereby supporting its continued protection and development as a designated cultural heritage site.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cahyono, U J, A Farkhan, and P S Nugroho. 2020. “Continuity of Tradition: Vernacularity of the Modern Javanese House Transformation in Laweyan, Surakarta.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 447 (1): 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012046.

Connell, R. 2009. Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Cosgrove, Denis E. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.

Creswell, John W., and David J. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.

Doratli, Naciye. 2005. “Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters: A Model for Determining the Most Relevant Strategic Approach.” European Planning Studies 13 (5): 749–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500139558.

Harsanto, Budi, and Chrisna T. Permana. 2021. “Sustainability-Oriented Innovation (SOI) in the Cultural Village: An Actor-Network Perspective in the Case of Laweyan Batik Village.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 11 (3): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2019-0102.

Hutter, Michael, and Ilde Rizzo. 1997. Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. Edited by Michael Hutter and Ilde Rizzo. 1st ed. University of Catana, Italy: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25824-6.

Kementerian Kebudayaan da Pariwisata Indonesia. 2010. Peraturan Menteri Kebudayaan Dan Pariwisata Nomor PM.03/PW.007/MKP/2010 Tahun 2010. Jakarta.

Lubis, Sahruddin, and Hari Zamharir. 2022. “Santri-Entrepreurs and Development of Community-Based Batik Industry at Laweyan, Solo, Indonesia.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies 4 (2): 01–07. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.2.1.

Massey, Doreen. 2001. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nur Awalia, Rezky, . Nurhayati, and . Kaswanto. 2017. “Kajian Karakter Pembentuk Lanskap Budaya Masyarakat Adat Kajang di Sulawesi Selatan.” Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 9 (2): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.2017.9.2.91-100.

Page, Robert R., Cathy Gilbert, and Susan Dolan. 1998. A Guide to Cultural Landscape Reports: Contents, Process, and Techniques. 1st ed. Washington DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

Papageorgiou, Alexander. 1971. Continuity and Change: Preservation in City Planning. London: Pall Mall Press.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2010. Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya. Indonesia: LN. 2010/ No. 130 , TLN NO. 5168, LL SETNEG : 54 HLM.

Priyomarsono, Naniek Widayati, Samsu Hendra Siwi, . Tony, Desi Arisandi, Muhammad Tohir Rafly, and Edward Brainard Pranata. 2025. “Mapping Cultural and Historical Areas: Exploration of Laweyan Surakarta Indonesia.” Journal of Posthumanism 5 (6): 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2180.

Renggani, Devi, and Dhamay Jhosha. 2024. “The History of Laweyan Batik Village as the Oldest Batik Industry in Surakarta.” HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah 12 (2): 427. https://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v12i2.9738.

Saha, Dipa, Sazdik Ahmed, Abu Towab Md. Shahriar, and S. M. Naeem Hossain Mithun. 2017. “A Journey through the History: Introduction to Heritage Tourism and Tourist Trails for the Renewal of Old Dhaka.” American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 5 (3): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-5-3-4.

Sarjiyanto, Sarjiyanto, Sarwoto Sarwoto, Mahinda Senevi Gunaratne, and R. B. Radin Firdaus. 2023. “Sustainable Industry, Culture and Community Development: A Case Study Of Kampung Batik Laweyan, Indonesia.” Journal Of Sustainability Science and Management 18 (1): 163–80. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.01.010.

Shabina, Sachdeva, Tamrakar Kumar Amit, and Perwez Eram. 2024. “Focus Group Discussion: An Emerging Qualitative Tool for Educational Research.” International Journal of Research and Review 11 (9): 302–8. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240932.

Small, K. 2010. A Short Guide To Heritage Trail. United Kingdom: Leicestershire County Council.

Strauss, Anselm. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Sunaryo, Bambang. 2013. Kebijakan Pembangunan Destinasi Pariwisata : Konsep Dan Aplikasinya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Sutcliffe, Alistair, Brian Gault, and Jae-Eun Shin. 2005. “Presence, Memory and Interaction in Virtual Environments.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 (3): 307–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.010.

Triratma, Bambang, Sri Yuliani, Yuan Efano Sofyan, and Assyafa’ul Basith. 2023. “Adaptive Reused Heritage Building Based on Sustainable Architecture.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (3): 453–64. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i3.2635.

UNESCO. 2017. “UNESCO Bangkok Announces 2017 Asia-Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation.” 2017. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-bangkok-announces-2017-asia-pacific-awards-cultural-heritage-conservation.

Widayati, Naniek. 2004. Settlement of Batik Entrepreneurs in Surakarta. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada Press.

Widayati, Naniek, and Rudy Surya. 2021. Kawasan Permukiman Saudagar Batik Laweyan Di Surakarta. Jakarta: CAC.

Widayati, Nanik P, Samsu H Siwi, Desi Arisandi, and Tony. 2024. “Laweyan As a Living Monument: Changes and Similarities in Artifacts And.” In 14th ISAIA 2.

Yuliani, Sri, and Wiwik Setyaningsih. 2023. “Green Architecture in Tourism Sustainable Development a Case Study at Laweyan, Indonesia.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 24 (1): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2287198.

Zhang, Ruijie, Miquel Martí Casanovas, Montserrat Bosch González, and Sijie Sun. 2024. “Revitalizing Heritage: The Role of Urban Morphology in Creating Public Value in China’s Historic Districts.” Land 13 (11): 1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111919.