Publicness as an indicator of sustainable built environment on Prawirotaman Street in Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i2.5076Keywords:
Mixed-use urban corridor, Publicness, Socio-spatial analysis, Sustainable built environment, Tourism gentrificationAbstract
This research examines the transformation of Prawirotaman Street, Yogyakarta, into a tourism-oriented mixed-use corridor and assesses publicness as an operative indicator of a sustainable built environment. Publicness is evaluated through three principal variables: social (interaction, inclusivity, participation), economic (commercial dominance, ownership patterns, livelihood transitions), and environmental (accessibility, vegetation, drainage, spatial comfort), across spatial units comprising a 500 m corridor, 481 m pedestrian pathways, building interfaces, and 21 designated observation points. A qualitative socio-spatial methodology was employed, integrating the theory of publicness (Carmona, 2015) with the production of space framework (Lefebvre, 1991). Data collection involved 19 structured field observations (spanning morning–evening cycles), in-depth interviews, and field surveys, reinforced by a synthesis of recent scholarly literature. The analytical process utilized thematic and comparative socio-spatial techniques. The findings indicate that 65% of buildings have transitioned to tourism-related functions, while only 26% of pedestrian space remains effectively functional, reflecting diminished accessibility and escalating privatization. Although economic activities have intensified, this growth is not accompanied by proportional improvements in social inclusivity or environmental quality. Publicness endures primarily at a micro-spatial scale through temporary, consumption-driven interactions. This study conceptualizes publicness as a comprehensive sustainability metric and underscores the necessity for pedestrian-oriented design strategies, ecological enhancements, and collaborative governance frameworks to re-establish socio-spatial equilibrium within tourism corridors.
Downloads
References
Astore, Antonia, and Luca Tricarico. 2024. “Understanding the Transformations of San Lorenzo, Rome: An Attempt at Conceptual Order between Gentrification and Urban Policy.” Land 13 (10): 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101632.
Carmona, Matthew. 2010. “Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (1): 123–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651.
Carmona, Matthew. 2015. “Re-Theorising Contemporary Public Space: A New Narrative and a New Normative.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 8 (4): 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518.
Carmona, Matthew. 2019. “Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better.” URBAN DESIGN International 24 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.
Cocola-Gant, Agustin, and Antonio Lopez-Gay. 2020. “Transnational Gentrification, Tourism and the Formation of ‘Foreign Only’ Enclaves in Barcelona.” Urban Studies 57 (15): 3025–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020916111.
Ekdi, Fatma Pelin, and Hale Çıracı. 2015. “Really Public? Evaluating the Publicness of Public Spaces in Istanbul by Means of Fuzzy Logic Modelling.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (5): 658–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1106919.
Ferreira, Marcela Alonso. 2022. “The Politics of Incremental Progressivism: Governments, Governances and Urban Policy Changes in São Paulo , Edited by Eduardo Cesar Leão Marques.” Journal of Urban Affairs 44 (4–5): 776–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1967030.
Fitria, Tika Ainunnisa, Mohd Hisyam Rasidi, and Ismail Said. 2022. “The Forming of Spontaneous Social Interaction Place in Kampung Transition Area, Prawirotaman, Indonesia.” Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management 7 (27): 392–404. https://doi.org/10.35631/JTHEM.727031.
Fitria, Tika Ainunnisa, Aprodita Emma Yetti, Mohd. Hisyam Rasidi, and Ismail Said. 2023. “A Review: Social Behaviour and Transitional Space in Kampung Prawirotaman, Yogyakarta.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1218 (1): 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012018.
Gehl, Jan. 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.
Gehl, Jan. 2013. Cities for People. Island Press.
Genç, Koray, Oğuz Türkay, and Şevki Ulema. 2022. “Tourısm Gentrıfıcatıon: Barcelona and Venıce.” Turismo y Sociedad 31 (June):125–40. https://doi.org/10.18601/01207555.n31.06.
Ghavimi, Amirmohammad, Annika Bonerath, and Jan-Henrik Haunert. 2025. “Towards Realistic Assignments Between Residents and Urban Public Green Spaces by Considering the Recreational Quality.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 18 (3): 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2.
Healey, Patsy. 2020. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hernadi, Nour Ardiansyah. 2020. “Prawirotaman as Kampung Inggris and The Improvement of Students Motivation in Learning English For.” Kepariwisataan: Jurnal Ilmiah 14 (01): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.47256/kepariwisataan.v14i01.17.
Hübscher, Marcus. 2021. “Megaprojects, Gentrification, and Tourism. A Systematic Review on Intertwined Phenomena.” Sustainability 13 (22): 12827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212827.
Lefebvre, Henri. 2014. The Production of Space. Routledge.
Li, Juan, Anrong Dang, and Yan Song. 2022. “Defining the Ideal Public Space: A Perspective from the Publicness.” Journal of Urban Management 11 (4): 479–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005.
López‐Gay, Antonio, Agustin Cocola‐Gant, and Antonio Paolo Russo. 2021. “Urban Tourism and Population Change: Gentrification in the Age of Mobilities.” Population, Space and Place 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2380.
Magalhães, Claudio De. 2010. “Public Space and the Contracting-out of Publicness: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 559–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502347.
Nahdatunnisa, Nahdatunnisa, Fajar Fajar, M. Arzal Tahir, and Ahsan Hidayat Setiadi. 2024. “The Role of Landscape Architecture in Sustainable Urban Development: Implementation of Universal Design.” Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies 22 (2): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2024.022.02.3.
Prayitno, Budi. 2017. “Co-Habitation Space: A Model for Urban Informal Settlement Consolidation for the Heritage City of Yogyakarta, Indonesia.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 16 (3): 527–34. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.527.
Sigler, Thomas, and David Wachsmuth. 2020. “New Directions in Transnational Gentrification: Tourism-Led, State-Led and Lifestyle-Led Urban Transformations.” Urban Studies 57 (15): 3190–3201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020944041.
Simpson, Ken. 2001. “Strategic Planning and Community Involvement as Contributors to Sustainable Tourism Development.” Current Issues in Tourism 4 (1): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500108667880.
Splichal, Slavko. 2022. “The Public Sphere in the Twilight Zone of Publicness.” European Journal of Communication 37 (2): 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211061490.
Suharyanto, Iwan, Irina van Aalst, Ilse van Liempt, and Annelies Zoomers. 2023. “More than Jedug-Jedug : Dynamics of Discontent with Tourist Activity in Prawirotaman, Yogyakarta.” Tourism Geographies 25 (1): 177–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1861080.
Titisari, Ema Yunita, Julaihi Wahid, Damayanti Asikin, Herlindah Herlindah, and Heptari Elita Dewi. 2024. “Community Development Strategy Through Identification of Tangible and Intangible Assets for The Development of Baran Buring Tourism Kampung.” Indonesian Journal Of Urban And Environmental Technology, July, 119–33. https://doi.org/10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v7i2.18067.
Titisari, Ema Yunita, Yusfan Adeputera Yusran, and Lisa Dwi Wulandari. 2023. “Strengthening Place Identity through Cultural Mapping, Case Study: Madura Pendalungan Kampong in Baran-Buring, Malang.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (1): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i1.1917.
Varna, George, and Steve Tiesdell. 2010. “Assessing the Publicness of Public Space:The Star Model of Publicness.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 575–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350.
Xu, Meng. 2024. “The Making of Everyday Space of Publicness: Insights from a Mall in Beijing.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 53 (6): 796–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416241273245.
Yang, Qinran, Yang Liu, and Linchuan Yang. 2022. “Commercial Gentrification in China and Its Distribution, Development, and Correlates: The Case of Chengdu.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.992092.
Yetti, Aprodita Emma, Tika Ainnunisa Fitria, and Indah Pujiyanti. 2020. “Pengaruh Perubahan Fungsi Terhadap Tipologi Arsitektur Fasad Bangunan Di Kampung Wisata Prawirotaman.” ARSITEKTURA 18 (1): 53. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v18i1.35770.
Zhang, Ruijie, Miquel Martí Casanovas, Montserrat Bosch González, and Sijie Sun. 2024. “Revitalizing Heritage: The Role of Urban Morphology in Creating Public Value in China’s Historic Districts.” Land 13 (11): 1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111919.
Zhu, Jingyi. 2022. “Repensar Lo Público: La Creación Del Espacio Público En Una «ciudad Global Excelente» y La Retórica y La Realidad de La Orientación Hacia Las Personas.” Arbor 198 (803–804): a647. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2022.803-804014.
Zhu, Jingyi. 2023. “Public Space and Its Publicness in People-Oriented Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of Shanghai.” Journal of Urban Affairs 47 (7): 2319–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2279597.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Monica Sheira, Ema Yunita Titisari, Damayanti Asikin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























