Architectural design principles of a University Campus that create an educational atmosphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v10i2.4181Keywords:
Architectural design, Educational campus, Fuzzy logic system, University campusAbstract
Architectural design holds a pivotal role in shaping the development of university campuses. This study critically examines the extent to which the architectural plans of four campuses correspond with the conceptual framework of an educational campus. The evaluation of design quality is crucial, as it significantly influences both academic and non-academic environments, thereby contributing to the overall enhancement of higher education quality. Adopting a mixed methods research (MMR) approach, the initial phase employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish the Priority Design Principles for Educational Campuses. Subsequently, the quantitative phase focuses on formulating a decision-making model to assess the quality of the educational atmosphere through the application of a fuzzy logic system. The findings of this research reveal that the top three design criteria, identified as having the highest priority, serve as the basis for developing a comprehensive model to evaluate campus designs grounded in the educational campus paradigm. These three key criteria functions as benchmarks for determining whether a campus’s architectural design satisfies the essential standards of an educational campus. An empirical assessment conducted across four university campuses indicates that only the campus design of Malikussaleh University falls short of meeting the educational campus design criteria. In contrast, the remaining three universities have successfully adhered to the principles underpinning the educational campus concept.
Downloads
References
Amirshekari, S., & Pourmand, H. 2015. The aspects of biological culture recreating and its relationship with the approach of contextual architecture (Bandar Abbas City). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 3(4 (s)), pp-475.
Baldwin, Eric (2022). Gateway to the Future: Rethinking Campus Design. 06 Jan 2022. ArchDaily. Accessed 1 Dec 2023. <https://www.archdaily.com/974671/gateway-to-the-future-rethinking-campus-design> ISSN 0719-8884
Barliana, M.S., Purnamaningsih, M., Ramadhan, T., Susanti, I. 2023. Friendly school design of early childhood based on traditional Sundanese architecture typology, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2153058
Barliana, M. S., Cahyani, D., & Mardiana, R. 2020. Creative adoption of Sundanese traditional architecture for architectural and campus interior design development. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 830, No. 2, p. 022064). IOP Publishing.
Bruno, Giuliana. 2007. Public Intimacy: Architecture and the Visual Arts. PublicIA @inproceedings. url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:190081673}
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. 2014. Advanced mixed methods research designs.
Cusumano, Vincent. 2023. The Importance of Contextual Harmony in Architecture. https://www.cusumano-architect.com/ideas/ context-is-key
Elhagla, Khalid., Nassar, Dina M., Ragheb. Mohamed A. 2020. Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal. www.elsevier.com/locate/aej
Glancey, Jonathan (2014). Sensing spaces: Emotional buildings. 21st October 2014. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140130-can-buildings-be-emotional
Gillason, Neil. 2010. Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. July 2010. Learning Environments Research 13(2):127-145. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x
Hanafizadeh, P., Khosravi, B., & Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2020). Rethinking dominant theories used in information systems field in the digital platform era. Digital policy, regulation and governance, 22(4), 363-384.
Kaplan, Rachel. 1993. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 26, Issues 1–4, 1993, Pages 193-201, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.org/10.1016 /0169-2046(93)90016-7.
Karim, B. A. 2020. Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Era 4.0 Dalam Pandemi Covid-19 (Refleksi Sosiologis). Education and Learning Journal, 1(2), 102-112.
Lambe, N. R., & Dongre, A. R. 2019. A shape grammar approach to contextual design: A case study of the Pol houses of Ahmedabad, India. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 845-861.
Laurens, J. M. 2004. Arsitektur & perilaku manusia. Grasindo.
Laurens, J. M., & Tanuwidjaja, G. 2012. Melalui pendekatan desain inklusi menuju arsitektur yang humanis (Doctoral dissertation, Petra Christian University).
Liauw, F. 2019. Reference for contextual design. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 508, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.
Maknun, J., Barliana, M.S., Cahyani, D. 2017. The Level of Environmental Literacy toward Vocational High School Students in West Java Province. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education 12(2). Bandung: UPI. DOI: 10.17509/invotec.v12i2.6205
Naba, Agus. 2009. Belajar cepat fuzzy logic menggunakan matlab. https://api. semantic scholar.org/CorpusID:64403327.
Quirk, Quirk. 2012. Community-Oriented Architecture in Schools: How 'Extroverted' Design Can Impact Learning and Change the World. https://www.archdaily.com/213438/
Reis, A. T. L., & Lay, M.C.D. 2010. Internal and external aesthetics of housing estates. Environment and Behavior. Sage Publications: 42, 271- 294.
Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European journal of operational research, 168(2), 557-570.
Sager, Jessica.2023. Learning Communities. Center of Developing Child. Harvard University. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/collective-change/key-concepts/learning-communities/
Sage, Travis. 2021. From hybrid learning to social hubs, trends are changing how universities operate and are designed. This article first appeared as “What will campus look like next?” in Stantec Design Quarterly, Issue 13. https://www.stantec. com/en/ideas/what-will-the-future-campus-look-like
Shanahan, D. F., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Lin, B. B., & Gaston, K. J. 2015. The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? BioScience, 65(5), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv032
Sotelo, P.C.C., 2010. The concept of" Educational Campus" and its application in Spanish universities.
Sunaryo, R. G. (2010). Perubahan Setting Ruang dan Pola Aktivitas Publik di Ruang Terbuka Kampus UGM.
Suryadi, D., Barliana, M.S., Kudwadi, B., Rahmanullah, F. 2020. Building Performance and Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Post Occupation Evaluation of Overseas Loan Financing Project. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. 2010. Putting the human back in ‘‘human research methodology’’: The researcher in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(4), 271-277.
Zallio, Matteo & Clarkson, P. John. 2021. Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diah Cahyani Permana Sari, Mokhamad Syaom Barliana, Rr. Tjahyani Busono, Muhammad Aditya Siddiq Alfajr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
