Pedestrian pathways along Tunjungan Street, Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i1.3917Keywords:
Pedestrian ways, Threshold space, Tunjungan Street Surabaya, Urban interiorityAbstract
This study seeks to investigate the functioning of pedestrian urban spaces as components of threshold environments, grounded in the theoretical framework of urban interiority. It addresses issues and phenomena associated with the use of pedestrian spaces, not solely as corridors for movement but as dynamic settings that accommodate diverse forms of urban social interaction. The research aims to clarify how threshold spaces operate as spatial mechanisms that enable social activities within the context of urban interiority. Utilizing a qualitative case study method, this research concentrates on the Tunjungan Corridor, a prominent street in Surabaya, to illustrate the ambiguous condition of the threshold between interior and exterior urban spaces as a unified spatial experience. The study involves mapping and drawing several segments of pedestrian space to demonstrate the emergence of threshold spaces as integral components of urban interiority. The findings offer a nuanced interpretation of the spatial operations of pedestrian environments as threshold spaces, examined through five principal elements: spatial design, spatial function, spatial definition, spatial structure (form and order), and spatial sequence. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of space design grounded in urban interiority and provide a reference framework for future spatial operations in pedestrian-oriented design.
Downloads
References
Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2021). Urban Interiority: Emerging Cultural and Spatial Practices. Interiority, 4(1), 1–4.
Attiwill, S. (2024). Interiority in the urban environment. In G. Marinic (Ed.), The interior urbanism theory reader (pp. 212–221). Routledge.
Attiwill, S. (2019). The subjective city. In Félix Guattari’s Ecosophical Practices and the Restoration of the ‘Subjective City’ (pp. 721-734). Routledge.
Boettger, T. (2014). Threshold spaces: Transitions in architecture: Analysis and design tools. Scribd.
Cognetti, F., & De Carli, B. (2024). Finding common ground on the threshold: An experiment in critical urban learning. Planning Theory, 23(4), 400–422.
Corbo, S. (2020). For an urban interiority. EdA Esempi di Architettura, 7(2), 1–14.
Darmawan, I. W., & Widiantara, I. G. S. (2021). Threshold space: Ruang antara dari Alun-alun Cicendo, Bandung. RUANG: Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (SPACE: Journal of the Built Environment), 11(2), 133–141.
Handinoto. (1996). Perkembangan kota dan arsitektur kolonial Belanda di Surabaya, 1870-1940.
Lucas, O. A., & Nuraeny, E. (2021). Spatial negotiation: Understanding the inside and outside of temporary space. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 673(1), 012042.
Lucas, R. (2020). Drawing parallels: Knowledge production in axonometric, isometric, and oblique drawings. Routledge.
Maheswari, N. R., Arvanda, E., & Kusuma, N. R. (2019). Permeable interior: Unfolding threshold space within transit corridors. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 523(1), 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/523/1/012059
Oswan, D. B., & Arifin, L. S. (2013). Fungsi pedestrian Jalan Tunjungan dari sirkulasi ke rekreasi: Studi kasus berdasarkan kesejarahan. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 40(2), 99–112.
Patriajaya, A. C., & Kusliansjah, Y. K. (2019). Hilangnya karakter pedestrian shopping street Jalan Tunjungan akibat transformasi Surabaya sebagai Kota Metropolitan. ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 4(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v4i1.81
Poerbantanoe, B. (1999). The lost-city dan lost-space karena perkembangan pengembangan tata-ruang kota: Kasus koridor komersial Jalan Tunjungan Kotamadya Surabaya. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 27(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.27.2.31-39
Poot, T., De Vos, E., & Van Acker, M. (2018). Thinking beyond dualities in public space: the unfolding of urban interiority as a set of interdisciplinary lenses. Interiors Design Architecture and Culture, 9(3), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1622235
Prasetiyo, A. Y., & Fuad, A. H. (2021). Crossing the threshold: understanding spatial patterns formed by threshold space in urban contexts. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 673(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/673/1/012037
Shah, S. J., & Muro, C. (2023). Manifestations of urban interiority in Delhi Gate Bazaar of Lahore. Interiority, 6(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.7454/in/v6i2.318
Shah, S. J. (2021). The interpretation of "interiority" through research in design context of public space. Reformulation of hypothesis (Paper presented at the CA2RE / CA2RE+ Ljubljana, Slovenia). Politecnico di Milano. https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1205193
Tedja, M., Hidayat, S. N. P., & Mariana, Y. (2023). Mixed-use building with threshold space approach in Central Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1169(1), 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1169/1/012062
Teston, L. (2020). On the Nature of Public Interiority. Interiority, 3(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v3i1.72
Wiratmoko, E. (2021). An evaluation of the alleys of Glodok and its market culture. ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 6(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.32938/arteks.v6i3.2547
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nathanael Nyoto, Bramasta Putra Redyantanu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
