Phenomenography as a research design in architecture: A multi-stage literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i3.5391Kata Kunci:
Categories of descriptions, Outcome space, Phenomenography, Spatial phenomena, Systematic literature reviewAbstrak
Phenomenography is a qualitative research approach concerned with investigating variations in the ways individuals experience, perceive, and understand particular phenomena. Although the approach was originally developed within the field of education, it has subsequently demonstrated considerable relevance to architectural and urban research. This paper applies phenomenography through a systematic literature review, beginning with an initial body of 1,195 articles that was progressively narrowed to 14 studies. From these studies, six principal thematic dimensions were identified: sensory-affective, representational, performative, cognitive-developmental, socio-political, and temporal. Three articles were subsequently examined in greater depth to establish a methodological protocol for applying phenomenography within architectural research. The findings demonstrate that phenomenography can effectively identify and represent the diversity of understandings associated with architectural design and spatial experience. The research process comprises four principal stages: (1) establishing the research focus; (2) defining and framing the phenomenon under investigation; (3) analyzing empirical material to develop descriptive categories through familiarization, condensation, comparison, and grouping; and (4) interpreting the findings through articulating, labeling, and contrasting categories in order to construct the Outcome Space. The Outcome Space constitutes the distinctive product of phenomenographic inquiry and can be understood as a “territory map” that represents variations in spatial experience through the relationships established among concepts and categories. Most architectural studies employing phenomenography remain primarily at the level of descriptive categorization, where experiential diversity is mapped and organized. Relatively few studies proceed toward the development of comprehensive outcome spaces. Such outcome spaces provide structural descriptions that possess considerable diagnostic potential for architectural design, education, pedagogy, and urban planning. properly, and there are gaps in the connection between units.
Unduhan
Referensi
Ahmad Hilmy, Ahmad Hakym, Khairul Aidil Azlin Abd Rahman, Azlan Ariff Ali Ariff, Kamal Mohd Idris, Azlan Ariff Ali Ariff, Liyana Mahfuzah Mohd For, and Mujahid Nawazir. 2025. “Empowering Architectural Narrative Through Urban Sketching: A Symbolic Interaction Framework for Enhancing Public Belonging in the Built Environment of Kuala Lumpur.” Journal of Design and Built Environment sp (VII): 250–62. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.spVII.16.
Bodner, George. 2004. “Twenty Years of Learning: How To Do Research in Chemical Education. 2003 George C. Pimentel Award.” Journal of Chemical Education 81 (5): 618. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p618.
Bowden, John A. 2000. “Experience of Phenomenographic Research: A Personal Account.” In Qualitative Research Methods: Phenomenography, edited by John A. Bowden and E. Walsh, 47–154. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Brennan, Teresa. 2004. The Transmission of Affect. 1st ed. Itacha and London: Cornell University Press.
Bruce, Christine Susan. 1997. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
Calvé, Maxime Le, and Olivier Gaudin. 2019. “Depicting Berlin’s Atmospheres: Phenomenographic Sketches.” Ambiances 5:1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.2667.
Canepa, Elisabetta, Valter Scelsi, Anna Fassio, Laura Avanzino, Giovanna Lagravinese, and Carlo Chiorri. 2019. “Atmospheres: Feeling Architecture by Emotions.” Ambiances 5:1–29. https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.2907.
Dall’alba, Gloria, and Jörgen Sandberg. 1996. “Educating for Competence in Professional Practice.” Instructional Science 24 (6): 411–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125578.
Erawati, Dela, Arina Hayati, and Sarah Cahyadini. 2021. “Exploring Informal Children‘s Play Space through Phenomenography Study.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (IJMRAP) 4 (3): 1–6.
Gandy, Matthew. 2017. “Urban Atmospheres.” Cultural Geographies 24 (3): 353–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017712995.
Georgiadou, Maria Christina, Cara Mulholland, and Sarah Fitton. 2025. “Social Value and Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR ) Through Inclusive Stakeholder Engagement in the UK Architecture, Engineering, and Construction ( AEC ) Sector.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 32 (6): 8661–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70156.
Griffero, Tonino. 2016. Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315568287.
Han, Feifei, and Robert A. Ellis. 2019. “Using Phenomenography to Tackle Key Challenges in Science Education.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (June):1414–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01414.
Kaapu, T., T. Saarenpää, T. Tiainen, and M.-K. Paakki. 2006. “The Truth Is Out There - Phenomenography in Information Systems Research.” In Proceedings of the 29th Information Systems Research Seminar, 12–15. Scandinavia; Helsingör; Denmark: Tampere University.
Kalvaitis, Darius, and Rebecca M. Monhardt. 2012. “The Architecture of Children’s Relationships with Nature: A Phenomenographic Investigation Seen through Drawings and Written Narratives of Elementary Students.” Environmental Education Research 18 (2): 209–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.598227.
Mann, Llewellyn, Gloria Dall’Alba, and David F Radcliffe. 2007. “Using Phenomenography to Investigate Different Ways of Experiencing Sustainable Design.” In 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 1–29. ASEE Conferences.
Marton, Ference. 1986. “Phenomenography—A Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality.” Journal of Thought 21 (3): 28–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189.
Marton, Ference. 1992. “Phenomenography and ‘the Art of Teaching All Things to All Men’’’.’” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 5 (3): 253–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839920050305.
Marton, Ference. 1993. “Our Experience of the Physical World.” Cognition and Instruction 10 (2–3): 227–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649009.
Marton, Ference, and Shirley Booth. 2013. Learning and Awareness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690.
Matteis, Frederico De, and Fatima Marchini. 2022. “Atmospheric Images: Photographic Encounters in L’Aquila’s Historic Center.” In Invisible Reconstruction: Cross-Disciplinary Responses to Natural, Biological and Man-Made Disasters. London: UCL Press.
Morselli, Elisa, and Federico de Matteis. 2020. “After the Ruins. An Affective Topography of Post-Earthquake.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Ambiances, Alloaesthesia: Senses, Inventions, Worlds, Réseau International Ambiances, 78–82. HAL Open Science.
Prosser, M. 2000. “Using Phenomenographic Research Methodology in the Context of Research in Teaching and Learning.” In Qualitative Research Methods: Phenomenography, edited by J. A. Bowden and E. Walsh. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Richard, Theodoor A. M., and Hui‐Chuan Pai. 2023. “Catching the Urban Atmosphere of Taichung, Taiwan.” Visual Anthropology Review 39 (2): 388–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12309.
Richardson, John T. E. 1999. “The Concepts and Methods of Phenomenographic Research.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 53–82.
Säljö, Roger. 1997. “Talk as Data and Practice — a Critical Look at Phenomenographic Inquiry and the Appeal to Experience.” Higher Education Research & Development 16 (2): 173–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160205.
Shankar, Sneha, Evie Gogosis, Anita Palepu, Anne M. Gadermann, and Stephen W. Hwang. 2018. “‘I Haven’t Given Up and I’m Not Gonna’: A Phenomenographic Exploration of Resilience Among Individuals Experiencing Homelessness.” Qualitative Health Research 29 (13): 1850–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318798353.
Sims, Danica Anne. 2024. “Introducing the Research Design of Phenomenography.” Medical Science Educator 34 (5): 1167–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02082-0.
Skinner, B.F. 2014. Science And Human Behavior. Cambridge: The B. F. Skinner Foundation.
Smith, Dianne. 2003. “Environmental Colouration and/or the Design Process.” Color Research & Application 28 (5): 360–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.10182.
Sumartojo, Shanti, Tim Edensor, and Sarah Pink. 2019. “Atmospheres in Urban Light.” Ambiances 5:1–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.2586.
Tallo, Amandus Jong. 2015. “Konsep Hina Gillen Sebagai Basis Harmonisasi Permukiman Suku Bunaq, Kabupaten Belu.” Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/80969.
Tomasella, Giuseppe. 2022. “Navigating Venice’s Literary Nightscapes through Post-Representational Mapmaking.” Journal of Reseacrh and Didactics in Geography 2:221–27.
Uljens, Michael. 1996. “On the Philosophical Foundations of Phenomenography.” In Reflections On Phenomenography: Toward A Methodology?, edited by Gloria Dall’alba and Biörn Hasselgren, 103–28. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Watson, John B. 1994. “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It.” Psychological Review 101 (2): 248–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.248.
Yates, Christine, Helen Partridge, and Christine Bruce. 2012. “Exploring Information Experiences through Phenomenography.” Library and Information Research 36 (112): 96–119. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg496.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Achmad Syaiful Lathif, Iwan Sudradjat, Indah Widiastuti

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























