ESG performance and debt financing costs: Evidence from Chinese real estate companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i3.5252
Crossmark

Keywords:

Debt financing costs, ESG performance, Media attention, Real estate companies

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance has become a crucial metric for assessing corporate sustainability. Against the backdrop of China’s urban transformation and green development agenda, ESG performance may exert a critical influence on the financing environment for real estate enterprises, key participants in urban construction and renewal. This study examines the relationship between ESG performance and debt financing costs for Chinese real estate firms, further investigating the moderating role of media attention. This empirical analysis examines data from Chinese A-share listed real estate companies between 2009 and 2022. After excluding samples with severe data missingness and considering the availability of CSI ESG data, a valid sample of 899 observations from 110 companies was obtained. A fixed-effects panel model was employed to investigate the relationship between overall ESG performance and debt financing costs. Results indicate that the ESG performance of listed real estate companies significantly influences debt financing costs, with media attention acting as a moderator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajinkya, B., Sanjeev, B., and Partha, S. 2005. ”The association between outside directors institutional, investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts.” Journal of Accounting Research 43(3): 343–376

Arevalo,J.A. and Arevind, D. 2017. ”Strategic Outcomes in Voluntary CSR: Reporting Economic and Reputational Benefits in Principles-Based Initiatives.” Journal of Business Ethics 144: 201-217.

Bai, Y.W., 2021. ”Study on the relationship between corporate ESG and cost of equity capital.” MA Dissertation, East China Normal University.

Baloria, V.P. and Heese, J. 2018. ”The effects of media slant on firm behavior.” Financial Economic 129: 184–202.

Benlemlih,M. 2018. ”Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 44: 1137-1166.

Boston Consulting Group. 2020. China ESG Investment Development Report. https://webassets.bcg.com/5e/f7/6a16f19a471fa97e3ca239c72c59/china-esg-investing-report.pdf

Chen, Y. et al. 2023. ”Effect of ESG performance on the equity capital costs: Evidence from China.” International Review of Economics & Finance 83: 348–364.

Chen, Z., and Xie, G. 2022. ”ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors.” International Review of Financial Analysis 83: 102291.

Chen. A.Q. 2022. ”ESG Performance, Media Attention and Cost of Equity Financing - An Example of Listed Companies in High Carbon Industries.” MA Dissertation, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics.

China Real Estate Information Corporation. 2024. China Real Estate Industry Summary and Outlook. DOI:10.20163/j.cnki.11-3651/f.2024.06.006

Cho, Y. 2022. ”ESG and Firm Performance: Focusing on the Environmental Strategy.” Sustainability 14(13): 7857.

Dyck, A. et al. 2019. ”Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? international evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 131(3): 693–714.

Elizabeth S., H. 2018. ”Responsible investment and ESG : an economic geography.” Phd thesis. University of Oxford.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., et al. 2018. ”Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence.” Journal of Business Ethics. 149.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., and Mishra, D. 2011. ”Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?” Journal of Banking & Finance. 35.

Fama, E.F. et al. 1992. ”The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Financial. 47: 427–465.

Gao, J.Y. et al. 2021. ”Can ESG performance improve corporate investment efficiency?” Securities Market Herald (11): 24-34,72

Gholami, A. 2022. ”Corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance disclosure and company's capital cost, idiosyncratic risk and market value.” PhD thesis. University of Southern Queensland.

Ghoul S E, Guedhami O, Nash R, et al. 2019. ”New Evidence on the Role of the Media in Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 154(4): 1-29.

Hail, l. & Leuz,C. 2006. ”International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter?” Journal of Accounting Research, 44: 485-531.

Hassan, O.A.G. & Romilly, P. 2018. ”Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights.” Business strategy and the environment 27: 893-909.

Johnson, R. 2020. ”The link between environmental, social and corporate governance disclosure and the cost of capital in South Africa.” Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences 13: e1-e12.

Kassinis, G. et al. 2016. ”Gender and environmental sustainability: a longitudinal analysis.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management 23: 399–412.

KPMG.(2022). Companies increasingly acknowledging ESG issues as risk areas. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2022/09/survey-of-sustainability-reporting-2022/esg.html.

Liu, M. et al. 2023. ”Public perceptions of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) based on social media data: Evidence from China.” Journal of Cleaner Production 387: 135840.

Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X.Y. and Kou, L. 2018. ”The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power.” The British Accounting Review 50: 60-75.

Mansouri, Sasan, and Paul P. Momtaz. 2022. “Financing Sustainable Entrepreneurship: ESG Measurement, Valuation, and Performance.” Journal of Business Venturing 37 (6): 106258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106258.

Matthews, L. 2019. ”Innovation disclosure and the cost of capital: UK-based evidence.” PhD thesis. University of Reading

Merton, R.C. 1987. ”A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information.” The Journal of Finance 42: 483-510.

Miller, M., Modigliani, F. 1958. ”The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review 261 – 297.

Modigliani, F., Miller, M. H. 1963. ”Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.” The American Economic Review 53(3).

Schiemann, F., and Tietmeyer, R. 2022. ”ESG controversies, ESG disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy.” International Review of Financial Analysis 84: 102373.

Sharfman, M. P., and Fernando, C. S. 2008. ”Environmental risk management and the cost of capital.” Strategic Management Journal 29: 569–592.

Tang, H. 2022. ”ESG performance, investors’ heterogeneous beliefs, and cost of equity capital in China.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.992559.

Trinks, A., Ibikunle, G., Mulder, M., and Scholtens, B. 2017. ”Greenhouse gas emissions intensity and the cost of capital. University of Groningen.” Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management) 17017-EEF.

Tzouvans,P., et al. 2020. ”Environmental disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in the European manufacturing sector.” Energy economics 87: 104715.

Wu, X., et al. 2021. ”Does media attention have a supervisory effect on major shareholders' illegal reduction?” Foreign Economy Management 43: 86–103.

Zhao, L.and Zhang, L. 2020. ”The influence of media attention on green technology innovation of enterprises: The regulatory role of marketization level.” Management Review, 32: 132–141.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

“ESG Performance and Debt Financing Costs: Evidence from Chinese Real Estate Companies”. 2026. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 11 (3): 959-66. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i3.5252.