Domestic sonic boundaries under intermittent railway noise invasion in an Urban Kampung

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i3.5097
Crossmark

Keywords:

Domestic sonic boundaries, Intermittent, Privacy invasion, Spatial element, Urban kampung

Abstract

Railway-adjacent urban kampung settlements constitute densely populated residential environments that are continuously subjected to intermittent train noise. This recurring acoustic exposure creates a form of domestic privacy intrusion, as external sound penetrates interior living spaces and interferes with residents’ everyday activities, thereby prompting an investigation into how domestic privacy is spatially negotiated in Kampung Gubeng, Surabaya. This study aims to examine both the distribution of railway noise within domestic environments and the ways residents mediate such exposure through spatial configurations and architectural elements. Employing a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design, the research combines qualitative-spatial data obtained through home tours and in-depth interviews with quantitative acoustic data derived from Sound Analyzer measurements and I-SIMPA simulations. The analytical framework explores the relationship between patterns of acoustic exposure and domestic spatial organization, interpreting residents’ adaptive responses through the architectural categories of fixed, semi-fixed, and non-fixed elements. The findings demonstrate that domestic sonic boundaries emerge through an ongoing negotiation between environmental noise conditions and everyday household practices. In mixed-use dwellings, the front portion of the house remains intentionally open to accommodate socio-economic activities, whereas in purely residential dwellings, greater acoustic protection is achieved through increased spatial depth and more controlled management of openings. Consequently, domestic sonic boundaries can be conceptualized as an adaptive spatial zoning strategy that gradually transitions from acoustically exposed areas to progressively more protected interior spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almusawi, Tahrir Taki Ali, Ashwaq Fadhel Muhkaber Alomare, Lina Kifah Kadhum, and Zainab Qahtan Abd Alkhayat. 2025. “The Impact of Building Façade Designs on Noise Reduction: A Case Study from Iraq.” Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development 29 (5): 589–97. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.2605.

Altman, Irwin, and Carol M. Werner. 2013. Home Environments. Edited by Irwin Altman and Carol M. Werner. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2266-3.

Altman, Irwin, and Joachim F. Wohlwill. 2012. Human Behavior and Environment ADVANCES IN THEORY AND RESEARCH : Environment and Culture. 4th ed. New York: Springer New York.

Badai Samodra, FX Teddy, Irvansyah, and Collinthia Erwindi. 2018. “Empowering Traditional House for Future Noise Control Based on Sound Frequency Propagation.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 213 (December):012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012020.

Blesser, Barry, and Linda-Ruth Salter. 2007. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening?: Experiencing Aural Architecture. MIT Press.

Chernysheva, Liubov. 2024. “The Vagaries of Sonic Neighborly Life: Privacy at Home and Sound Politics in Post-Socialist Mass Housing.” Space and Culture 27 (3): 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312231210103.

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications.

Cucharero, Jose, Tuomas Hänninen, and Tapio Lokki. 2019. “Influence of Sound-Absorbing Material Placement on Room Acoustical Parameters.” Acoustics 1 (3): 644–60. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics1030038.

Fleming, Genie M., Moataz M. ElQadi, Ruzka R. Taruc, Autiko Tela, Grant A. Duffy, Emma E. Ramsay, Peter A. Faber, and Steven L. Chown. 2023. “Classification and Ecological Relevance of Soundscapes in Urban Informal Settlements.” People and Nature 5 (2): 742–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10454.

Groat, Linda N., and David Wang. 2013. Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Husin, Denny. 2026. ‘The Heterotopia of Urban Kampung in Jakarta: Revealing the Other Pattern through Mapping’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 11 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i1.3925.

Kang, Jian. 2023. “Soundscape in City and Built Environment: Current Developments and Design Potentials.” City and Built Environment 1 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44213-022-00005-6.

Kang, Jian, and Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp. 2018. Soundscape and the Built Environment. Edited by Jian Kang and Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19145.

Kerr, Sophie-May, Natascha Klocker, and Chris Gibson. 2021. “From Backyards to Balconies: Cultural Norms and Parents’ Experiences of Home in Higher-Density Housing.” Housing Studies 36 (3): 421–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1709625.

LaBelle, Brandon. 2020. Acoustic Justice: Listening, Performativity, and the Work of Reorientation. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=3lMKEAAAQBAJ.

Lang, Jon T. 1987. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Lang, Jon T., and Walter Moleski. 2010. Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Murphy, Enda, and Eoin A. King. 2022. “Principles of Environmental Noise.” In Environmental Noise Pollution, 9–51. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820100-8.00002-6.

Mustafa, Shilan Ameen, and Banaz Nasraldeen Muhealdeen. 2023. “Acoustic Comfort Evaluation in Traditional Houses and Its Impact on Inhabitant Satisfaction in the City of Sulaimani.” UHD Journal of Science and Technology 7 (2): 50–68. https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdjst.v7n2y2023.pp50-68.

Niezabitowska, Elżbieta Danuta. 2018. Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165592.

Ramadhani, A, E Fatimah, and A S Wartaman. 2021. “Place Attachment of Railroad Settlement Residents, Case Study: Kampong Tenggumung, Surabaya City.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 737 (1): 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/737/1/012065.

Rapoport, Amos. 2005. Culture, Architecture, and Design. Locke Science Publishing Company.

Samra, Boby, Dwira Nirfalini Aulia, Dwi Lindarto, and Hilma Tamiami Fachrudin. 2024. “Privacy Principles in Malay House Design: Integrating Visual and Acoustic Privacy in Selatpanjang Residences.” Edited by M. Aziz, M.R.P. Sakti, I. Purnama, and T. Derin. E3S Web of Conferences 593 (November):02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459302003.

Sompie, Ivana Agnes, Coriesta Dian Sulistiani, and Tampanatu P. F. Sompie. 2022. “The Adaptation to Sonic Territoriality: A Domestic Space Case Study.” Civil Engineering and Architecture 10 (5): 1967–82. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100519.

Suhartini, Ninik, and Paul Jones. 2023. Beyond the Informal. The Urban Book Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22239-9.

Sunjoto, Margareth. 2023. ‘Rethinking Indonesia’s Lighting Standard for Urban Kampung Roads’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (3): 357–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i3.2203.

Tan, Diwen, and Minh Quang Nguyen. 2024. “Beyond the Palimpsest: Traditions and Modernity in Urban Villages of Shenzhen, China.” Cities 151 (August):105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105093.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

“Domestic Sonic Boundaries under Intermittent Railway Noise Invasion in an Urban Kampung”. 2026. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 11 (3): 801-16. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v11i3.5097.

Most read articles by the same author(s)